These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20837652)

  • 1. Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as human carcinogens.
    Huff J
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Oct; 67(10):720. PubMed ID: 20837652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
    Vainio H; Hemminki K
    J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.
    Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 16555967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cancer risks projected from animal bioassays to epidemiologic studies of acrylonitrile-exposed workers.
    Ward CE; Starr TB
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Oct; 18(2):214-32. PubMed ID: 8278643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Highlights of International meeting on Alternative Methods of Carcinogenicity Testing, Leesburg, VA, November 1-3, 2000, Sponsored by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute.
    Jollow DJ
    J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):427-9. PubMed ID: 19785235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiology of occupational carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ruder AM
    Occup Med; 1996; 11(3):487-512. PubMed ID: 8887381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models.
    Johnson FM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of chemicals: a review of the Monograph Program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (1971 to 1977).
    Tomatis L; Agthe C; Bartsch H; Huff J; Montesano R; Saracci R; Walker E; Wilbourn J
    Cancer Res; 1978 Apr; 38(4):877-85. PubMed ID: 346205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species susceptibilities to chemical carcinogens: a critical appraisal of the roles of sex hormones (endocrine status) and nutritional influences.
    Toth B
    In Vivo; 2002; 16(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 12182110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medium-term bioassays in rats for rapid detection of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Shirai T; Hirose M; Ito N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):251-72. PubMed ID: 10353390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of non-mammalian species in bioassays for carcinogenicity.
    Bunton TE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):151-84. PubMed ID: 10353387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Historical perspective on the use of animal bioassays to predict carcinogenicity: evolution in design and recognition of utility.
    Beyer LA; Beck BD; Lewandowski TA
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):321-38. PubMed ID: 21438739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Mennear J; French JE; Spalding JW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):123-50. PubMed ID: 10353386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying cancer sites for human carcinogens in the IARC monographs.
    Huff J; Infante P
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):140. PubMed ID: 19151229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contemporary trends in in vivo and in vitro testing of chemical carcinogens.
    Slamenová D
    Neoplasma; 2001; 48(6):425-34. PubMed ID: 11949832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Identification of human carcinogenic risks in IARC monographs].
    Vainio H; Wilbourn JD; Sasco AJ; Partensky C; Gaudin N; Heseltine E; Eragne I
    Bull Cancer; 1995; 82(5):339-48. PubMed ID: 7626841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental cancer hazards.
    Hueper WC
    J Occup Med; 1972 Feb; 14(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 5060741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interspecies sensitivity to chemical carcinogens.
    Nesnow S; Agarwal SC; Lambert GR; Earley K; Gupta RC
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 374():381-97. PubMed ID: 1620714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.