These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20837652)
21. [Cancer--occupational exposure and genetics]. Haugen A; Ryberg D; Skaug V; Ovrebø S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 May; 109(14):1529-34. PubMed ID: 2749642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Zhang H; Cao ZX; Li M; Li YZ; Peng C Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97():141-149. PubMed ID: 27597133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of genetically modified animals in carcinogenicity bioassays. Maronpot RR Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 10862565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Descriptive summaries of the data on the basis of which the chemicals, industrial processes and industries were evaluated for carcinogenicity to humans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum Suppl; 1982 Oct; (4):25-276. PubMed ID: 6963264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The predictive value of rodent carcinogenicity tests in the evaluation of human risks. Tomatis L Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 1979; 19():511-30. PubMed ID: 378109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Detecting and predicting the activity of rodent carcinogens. Parry JM Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 7911554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs (IARC)]. Terracini B G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2008; 30(1):83; author reply 86-7. PubMed ID: 18700682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Editorial on the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluation]. Carta P G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2008; 30(1):85; author reply 86-7. PubMed ID: 18705062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical surveillance and biomonitoring for occupational cancer endpoints. Cone JE; Rosenberg J Occup Med; 1990; 5(3):563-81. PubMed ID: 2218803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens. Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans]. IARC Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [New look at problems of assessment and tolerance of certain carcinogens in food in view of the literature]. Nabrzyski M Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1994; 45(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 7878331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implications of the lack of accuracy of the lifetime rodent bioassay for predicting human carcinogenicity. Ennever FK; Lave LB Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 38(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 12878054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluations: the way they are conducted and their implications]. Soleo L G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2008; 30(1):85; author reply 86-7. PubMed ID: 18705063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]