228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20837732)
1. New authors' guidelines for Palliative Medicine: more work for authors, reviewers and editors or an essential tool?
Walshe C
Palliat Med; 2010 Sep; 24(6):559-60. PubMed ID: 20837732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.
Ohler L
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 16350891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
Klein JS; Harmon SP;
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
Green SM; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
Kulstad E
PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editor and authors' psychology and the chance of teaching.
Grammaticos PC
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 17160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Authors' financial interests should be made known to manuscript reviewers.
de Melo-Martín I; Intemann K
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7150):129. PubMed ID: 17625543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
Erb HN
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Author perception of peer review.
Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
García-Doval I
PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.
Barroga EF
J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Authors, reviewers and editors at The EMBO Journal.
Rørth P
EMBO J; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3831-3. PubMed ID: 16453402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tips for manuscript reviewers.
Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA
Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12841086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
