These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20837813)
21. Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects. Lan YW; Hsieh JW; Sun FJ J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20436367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression. Artes PH; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Signal/noise ratios to compare tests for measuring visual field progression. Ernest PJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6893; author reply 6893-4. PubMed ID: 21123778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Tilted disc syndrome may mimic false visual field deterioration. Vuori ML; Mäntyjärvi M Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 18162059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions. Bachmann G; Fahle M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of diagnostic capabilities of interactive test strategies in automated perimetry. Mills RP Ophthalmology; 1985 Sep; 92(9):1181-6. PubMed ID: 4058880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Bengtsson B; Patella VM; Heijl A Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1610-5. PubMed ID: 20008716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Costa VP Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 138(5):897-8; author reply 898-9. PubMed ID: 15531345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive value of confocal scanning laser for the onset of visual field loss in glaucoma suspects. Larrosa JM; Polo V; Ferreras A; Gil L; Fuertes I; Pablo LE Ophthalmology; 2012 Aug; 119(8):1558-62. PubMed ID: 22584019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Goldmann field testing in glaucoma. Williams TD Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 72(7):532-4. PubMed ID: 8539018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Objective measurement of visual field by using visual evoked potentials]. Tobimatsu S Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Mar; 55 Suppl 1():450-3. PubMed ID: 9097648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing field defects of the low-vision patient. Goodlaw EI Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Jun; 58(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 7270658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vigabatrin-induced peripheral visual field defects in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Sergott RC; Bittman RM; Christen EM; Sagar SM Epilepsy Res; 2010 Dec; 92(2-3):170-6. PubMed ID: 20951555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new chart to improve the efficiency of glaucoma detection by oculokinetic perimetry. Stirling RJ; MacLeod JD; Vernon SA Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 1)():121-4. PubMed ID: 8013705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mass visual field investigation in 1834 persons with supposedly normal eyes. Greve EL; Verduin WM Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1972; 183(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 4537006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Automatic perimetry. Douglas GR Can J Ophthalmol; 1980 Jul; 15(3):107-8. PubMed ID: 7437935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]