These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2083892)
1. [Objective determination of refraction]. Friedburg D Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87 Suppl():S138-41. PubMed ID: 2083892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction? Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A new ophthalmologic refractometer assisted by a microprocessor]. Corno F; Ratier C; Simon J; Zenatti C J Fr Ophtalmol; 1984; 7(6-7):485-92. PubMed ID: 6501787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [How accurate is video refraction measurement in infants in comparison with skiascopy? How much do the values change within a half a year?]. Bischoff P; Althaus K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Sep; 205(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 7996816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of off-the-visual-axis retinoscopy on objective refractive measurement. Jackson DW; Paysse EA; Wilhelmus KR; Hussein MA; Rosby G; Coats DK Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 137(6):1101-4. PubMed ID: 15183796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements. Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of "near retinoscopy" and subjective refraction in adults. Mohindra I Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 May; 54(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 900252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia. Goh PP; Abqariyah Y; Pokharel GP; Ellwein LB Ophthalmology; 2005 Apr; 112(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 15808262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of cycloplegic refraction to the near retinoscopy technique for refractive error determination. Wesson MD; Mann KR; Bray NW J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 2212460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors. Schimitzek T; Haase W Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 12271366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction. Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study between subjective and objective refraction using the Autorefractor 6600 on 200 eyes in children]. Menerath JM; Michel M; Dalens H; Rigal D Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1189-93. PubMed ID: 6679825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aphakic ultrasonographic refraction in adults. Comparison with retinoscopy and subjective refraction. Belkin M; Horev G Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol; 1982; 6(3-4):269-72. PubMed ID: 7185018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-cycloplegic refractive screening can identify infants whose visual outcome at 4 years is improved by spectacle correction. Anker S; Atkinson J; Braddick O; Nardini M; Ehrlich D Strabismus; 2004 Dec; 12(4):227-45. PubMed ID: 15545141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Automatic refractometry, reliability of the determination of type and degree of refraction anomalies]. Kovacić Z; Ivanisević M; Plestina-Borjan I; Capkun V Lijec Vjesn; 1998 Jun; 120(6):162-4. PubMed ID: 9819515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]