BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20839107)

  • 21. Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics.
    Matros A; Kaspar S; Witzel K; Mock HP
    Phytochemistry; 2011 Jul; 72(10):963-74. PubMed ID: 21176926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistical identification of differentially labeled peptides from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
    Cho H; Smalley DM; Theodorescu D; Ley K; Lee JK
    Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(20):3681-92. PubMed ID: 17879999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Global quantitative proteomic profiling through 18O-labeling in combination with MS/MS spectra analysis.
    White CA; Oey N; Emili A
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3653-65. PubMed ID: 19400582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shotgun proteomics: a qualitative approach applying isoelectric focusing on immobilized pH gradient and LC-MS/MS.
    Geiser L; Vaezzadeh AR; Deshusses JM; Hochstrasser DF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 681():449-58. PubMed ID: 20978982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An off-line high pH reversed-phase fractionation and nano-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for global proteomic profiling of cell lines.
    Wang H; Sun S; Zhang Y; Chen S; Liu P; Liu B
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2015 Jan; 974():90-5. PubMed ID: 25463202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A label-free nano-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry approach for quantitative serum peptidomics in Crohn's disease patients.
    Nanni P; Levander F; Roda G; Caponi A; James P; Roda A
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 877(27):3127-36. PubMed ID: 19683480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Generic workflow for quality assessment of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysis.
    Sandin M; Krogh M; Hansson K; Levander F
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1114-24. PubMed ID: 21298787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Method development for metaproteomic analyses of marine biofilms.
    Leary DH; Hervey WJ; Li RW; Deschamps JR; Kusterbeck AW; Vora GJ
    Anal Chem; 2012 May; 84(9):4006-13. PubMed ID: 22468925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry based targeted proteomics quantification of P-glycoprotein in various biological samples.
    Zhang Y; Li N; Brown PW; Ozer JS; Lai Y
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Jun; 25(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 21598331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality control of nano-LC-MS systems using stable isotope-coded peptides.
    Burkhart JM; Premsler T; Sickmann A
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1049-57. PubMed ID: 21328538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. LFQuant: a label-free fast quantitative analysis tool for high-resolution LC-MS/MS proteomics data.
    Zhang W; Zhang J; Xu C; Li N; Liu H; Ma J; Zhu Y; Xie H
    Proteomics; 2012 Dec; 12(23-24):3475-84. PubMed ID: 23081734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantitation in the central proteomics facilities pipeline.
    Trudgian DC; Ridlova G; Fischer R; Mackeen MM; Ternette N; Acuto O; Kessler BM; Thomas B
    Proteomics; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2790-7. PubMed ID: 21656681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A simple peak detection and label-free quantitation algorithm for chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Aoshima K; Takahashi K; Ikawa M; Kimura T; Fukuda M; Tanaka S; Parry HE; Fujita Y; Yoshizawa AC; Utsunomiya S; Kajihara S; Tanaka K; Oda Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):376. PubMed ID: 25420746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An automated pipeline for high-throughput label-free quantitative proteomics.
    Weisser H; Nahnsen S; Grossmann J; Nilse L; Quandt A; Brauer H; Sturm M; Kenar E; Kohlbacher O; Aebersold R; Malmström L
    J Proteome Res; 2013 Apr; 12(4):1628-44. PubMed ID: 23391308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility assessment of relative quantitation strategies for LC-MS based proteomics.
    Kim YJ; Zhan P; Feild B; Ruben SM; He T
    Anal Chem; 2007 Aug; 79(15):5651-8. PubMed ID: 17580949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys.
    America AH; Cordewener JH
    Proteomics; 2008 Feb; 8(4):731-49. PubMed ID: 18297651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Urinary proteomics analysis for renal injury in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with iTRAQ labeling and LC-MS/MS.
    Chen G; Zhang Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Niu J; Chen J; Gu Y
    Proteomics Clin Appl; 2011 Jun; 5(5-6):300-10. PubMed ID: 21538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling.
    Roy SM; Becker CH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 359():87-105. PubMed ID: 17484112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing reproducibility of a protein dynamics study using in vivo labeling and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
    Molina H; Parmigiani G; Pandey A
    Anal Chem; 2005 May; 77(9):2739-44. PubMed ID: 15859588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is label-free LC-MS/MS ready for biomarker discovery?
    Sandin M; Chawade A; Levander F
    Proteomics Clin Appl; 2015 Apr; 9(3-4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25656266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.