427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20839367)
1. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2838-56. PubMed ID: 20860066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.
Kenward MG; Roger JH
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):983-97. PubMed ID: 9333350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
Chen X; Wei L
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.
Pan W; Wall MM
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties of internal pilots with the univariate approach to repeated measures.
Coffey CS; Muller KE
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2469-85. PubMed ID: 12872303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
Gosho M; Maruo K
Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting the best unbalanced repeated measures model.
Vallejo G; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE; Tuero-Herrero E
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 21287107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size calculations for population pharmacodynamic experiments involving repeated dichotomous observations.
Ogungbenro K; Aarons L
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1212-27. PubMed ID: 18991118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.
Vonesh EF; Chinchilli VM; Pu K
Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):572-87. PubMed ID: 10766504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Specification of covariance structure in longitudinal data analysis for randomized clinical trials.
Lu K; Mehrotra DV
Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(4):474-88. PubMed ID: 20020423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
Abad AA; Litière S; Molenberghs G
Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 20407039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A latent-class mixture model for incomplete longitudinal Gaussian data.
Beunckens C; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Mallinckrodt C
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 17608789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working covariance model selection for generalized estimating equations.
Carey VJ; Wang YG
Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(26):3117-24. PubMed ID: 21748775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating equations for association structures.
Yan J; Fine J
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):859-74; discussion 875-7,879-80. PubMed ID: 15027075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.
Siddiqui O; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):227-46. PubMed ID: 19212876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
