319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20839502)
1. Comparing manual and automated coding of physicians quality reporting initiative measures in an ambulatory EHR.
McColm D; Karcz A
J Med Pract Manage; 2010; 26(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20839502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The physicians quality reporting initiative: measure development, implementation and current procedural terminology coding.
Myles JL; Shamanski F; Witte D
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 20032639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative: a practical approach to implementing quality reporting.
Wintz R; Rosenthal B; Fadem SZ
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2008 Jan; 15(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18155110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. To participate or not in the physician quality reporting initiative (PQRI); that is the question.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2007 May; 79(5):197-204. PubMed ID: 17536577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring for Medicare: the physician quality reporting initiative.
Bagley B
Fam Pract Manag; 2007 Jun; 14(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 17598633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) and other performance measurement programs.
Russell TR
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jun; 93(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 18672611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.
Chan KS; Fowles JB; Weiner JP
Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):503-27. PubMed ID: 20150441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The physician quality reporting initiative--a gateway to pay for performance: what every health care professional should know.
Stulberg J
Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 18204372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.
Persell SD; Wright JM; Thompson JA; Kmetik KS; Baker DW
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2272-7. PubMed ID: 17101947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CMS releases final 2014 meaningful use clinical quality measures.
Health Devices; 2012 Dec; 41(12):399. PubMed ID: 23444684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.
Hsiao CJ; Hing E; Socey TC; Cai B
NCHS Data Brief; 2011 Nov; (79):1-8. PubMed ID: 22617322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physicians' participation in the Physicians' Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care.
Federman AD; Keyhani S
Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Providers fight CMS' quality initiative. Controversial proposal would cut outpatient pay for not reporting inpatient data.
Evans M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(41):10-1. PubMed ID: 17086953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. PQRI redux. CMS outlines changes to foster physician reporting.
McKinney M
Mod Healthc; 2010 Jul; 40(27):8-9. PubMed ID: 20669390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pay for reporting: the 2007 1.5% Medicare bonus.
Nicoletti B
J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 22(6):348-9. PubMed ID: 17612310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PQRI-deux.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2008 Mar; 79(3):115. PubMed ID: 18302950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Completeness, accuracy, and computability of National Quality Forum-specified eMeasures.
Amster A; Jentzsch J; Pasupuleti H; Subramanian KG
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 25326598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legally speaking: Ready or not...time to report! The 2008 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative.
Batcheller SH
J Ark Med Soc; 2008 Mar; 104(9):209-10, 212. PubMed ID: 18363266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The PQRI Catch-22. The CMS 1.5 percent reimbursement may incentivize IT adoption, but will it do so equally, and is it enough?
Stinson P
Health Manag Technol; 2007 Oct; 28(10):42-4. PubMed ID: 17969727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
