277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20839703)
1. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.
Fisher DA; Bengero LL; Clapp BC; Burgess M
Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new suture for hair transplantation: poliglecaprone 25.
Bernstein RM; Rassman WR; Rashid N
Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11231232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Skin closure. A prospective randomized study].
Lundblad R; Simensen HV; Wiig JN; Niels Grüner OP
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr; 109(12):1307-9. PubMed ID: 2660322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device.
Tellis VA
Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Running Subcuticular Closure Enables the Most Robust Perfusion After TKA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wyles CC; Jacobson SR; Houdek MT; Larson DR; Taunton MJ; Sim FH; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25733009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M;
Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure.
Patel RM; Cayo M; Patel A; Albarillo M; Puri L
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
Dresner HS; Hilger PA
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty].
Mengal B; Aebi J; Rodriguez A; Lemaire R
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Feb; 87(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11240535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MONOCRYL and DERMABOND vs Staples in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Lateral Skin Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Patient-Centered Assessment Tool.
Glennie RA; Korczak A; Naudie DD; Bryant DM; Howard JL
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2431-2435. PubMed ID: 28438450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesive strips versus subcuticular suture for mediansternotomy wound closure.
Lazar HL; McCann J; Fitzgerald CA; Cabral HJ
J Card Surg; 2011 Jul; 26(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 21554389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.
Gatt D; Quick CR; Owen-Smith MS
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):318-20. PubMed ID: 3901864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
