These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20840286)

  • 1. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
    Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
    Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates?
    Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex mixtures: a critical examination of a paper by Homer et al.
    Egeland T; Fonneløp AE; Berg PR; Kent M; Lien S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21429835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.
    Weir BS
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):1009-14. PubMed ID: 15461102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel fluorescent quadruplex STR typing system and the allele frequency distributions in a Thai population.
    Yoshimoto T; Yamamoto T; Mizutani M; Uchihi R; Ohtaki H; Katsumata Y; Waiyawuth W; Songsivilai S
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 12570210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
    Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A classifier for the SNP-based inference of ancestry.
    Frudakis T; Venkateswarlu K; Thomas MJ; Gaskin Z; Ginjupalli S; Gunturi S; Ponnuswamy V; Natarajan S; Nachimuthu PK
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):771-82. PubMed ID: 12877291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining allele frequency uncertainty and population substructure corrections in forensic DNA calculations.
    Cowell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():210-216. PubMed ID: 27231804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.