BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20841315)

  • 1. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A study on the intrinsic compensative mechanism of craniofacial soft and hard tissue structures of Uygur adults with normal occlusion].
    Jin H; Luo S; Bai D; Song J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Aug; 18(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 12539541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relationship between molar dentoalveolar and craniofacial heights.
    Martina R; Farella M; Tagliaferri R; Michelotti A; Quaremba G; van Eijden TM
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):974-9. PubMed ID: 16448240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in dentofacial characteristics between southern versus northern Chinese adolescents.
    Gu Y; Hagg U; Wu J; Yeung S
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22372272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Spontaneous dento-cephalometric changes after the young adult stage].
    Crétot M
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 9432623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notching.
    Lambrechts AH; Harris AM; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 8863961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):27-32, 10. PubMed ID: 11324403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
    Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.