These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20841459)

  • 21. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow J; Soares Cevidanes LH; Mol A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 18298214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.
    Raj G; Raj M; Saigo L
    J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 37340975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.
    Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Frazäo DC; McNamara JA; Manzi FR
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 20936951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
    Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography.
    de Oliveira AE; Cevidanes LH; Phillips C; Motta A; Burke B; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 18718796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses.
    Navarro Rde L; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Fernandes TM; Oliveira GF; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida RR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 23739848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
    Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results.
    Kamoen A; Dermaut L; Verbeeck R
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 11668876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms.
    Legrell PE; Nyquist H; Isberg A
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Apr; 70(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10833005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.