BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20842375)

  • 1. A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations.
    Lyden K; Kozey SL; Staudenmeyer JW; Freedson PS
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Feb; 111(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 20842375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers.
    Crouter SE; Churilla JR; Bassett DR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Dec; 98(6):601-12. PubMed ID: 17058102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of accelerometer regression models in predicting energy expenditure and METs in children and youth.
    Alhassan S; Lyden K; Howe C; Kozey Keadle S; Nwaokelemeh O; Freedson PS
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2012 Nov; 24(4):519-36. PubMed ID: 23196761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.
    Eisenmann JC; Strath SJ; Shadrick D; Rigsby P; Hirsch N; Jacobson L
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Mar; 91(2-3):259-63. PubMed ID: 14569402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing ActiGraph equations for estimating energy expenditure in older adults.
    Aguilar-Farias N; Peeters GMEEG; Brychta RJ; Chen KY; Brown WJ
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 29912666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy cost of walking in older adults: accuracy of the ActiGraph accelerometer predictive equations.
    Ndahimana D; Kim YJ; Wang CS; Kim EK
    Nutr Res Pract; 2022 Oct; 16(5):565-576. PubMed ID: 36238379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of BMI on prediction of accelerometry-based energy expenditure in youth.
    Warolin J; Carrico AR; Whitaker LE; Wang L; Chen KY; Acra S; Buchowski MS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Dec; 44(12):2428-35. PubMed ID: 22776880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers.
    Rothney MP; Schaefer EV; Neumann MM; Choi L; Chen KY
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2008 Aug; 16(8):1946-52. PubMed ID: 18535553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerometer prediction of energy expenditure: vector magnitude versus vertical axis.
    Howe CA; Staudenmayer JW; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Dec; 41(12):2199-206. PubMed ID: 19915498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.
    Swartz AM; Strath SJ; Bassett DR; O'Brien WL; King GA; Ainsworth BE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S450-6. PubMed ID: 10993414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
    Lee P; Tse CY
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating energy expenditure using body-worn accelerometers: a comparison of methods, sensors number and positioning.
    Altini M; Penders J; Vullers R; Amft O
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 24691168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
    Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of linear and non-linear models for predicting energy expenditure from raw accelerometer data.
    Montoye AHK; Begum M; Henning Z; Pfeiffer KA
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Feb; 38(2):343-357. PubMed ID: 28107205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of ActiGraph GT3X+ placement location in the estimation of energy expenditure during moderate and high-intensity physical activities in young and older adults.
    Kossi O; Lacroix J; Ferry B; Batcho CS; Julien-Vergonjanne A; Mandigout S
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Jul; 39(13):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33514289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of ActiGraph child-specific equations during various physical activities.
    Crouter SE; Horton M; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jul; 45(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 23439413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear Armband to estimate energy expenditure during physical activity and sport.
    Gastin PB; Cayzer C; Dwyer D; Robertson S
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 28797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer.
    Staudenmayer J; Pober D; Crouter S; Bassett D; Freedson P
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Oct; 107(4):1300-7. PubMed ID: 19644028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of three ActiGraph energy expenditure equations for children.
    Trost SG; Way R; Okely AD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Feb; 38(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 16531910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.