These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20842537)

  • 21. Soft responses to misconduct.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Research misconduct: Can Australia learn from the UK's stuttering system?
    Marcovitch H
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):616-8. PubMed ID: 17181505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview.
    Lafollette MC
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.
    Sox HC; Rennie D
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Apr; 144(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 16522625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research misconduct, NSF v NIH: Its nature and prevalence and the impact of their respective methods of investigation and adjudication.
    Kornfeld DS
    Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 31324124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
    Pascal CB
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Federal agency says researcher misled colleagues and institutional administrators.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Baltimore case.
    Fielder JH
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 10101677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.