204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20844171)
1. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kung YP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():145-57. PubMed ID: 20844171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.
Kim SJ; Kim TE; Jo SB; Kung YP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 91(11):2543-9. PubMed ID: 19884425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Cooper DE; Stewart D
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a new arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle technique.
Jordan SS; Campbell RB; Sekiya JK
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2007 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 18004216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Fanelli GC; Edson CJ
Arthroscopy; 2004 Apr; 20(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 15067271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.
Zhang J; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Zheng T; Li Y
Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():18-25. PubMed ID: 33813104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Fanelli GC; Edson CJ
Arthroscopy; 2002 Sep; 18(7):703-14. PubMed ID: 12209427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using tibial-inlay and double-bundle technique.
Kim SJ; Park IS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1271. PubMed ID: 16226662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Jordan SS; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1356.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18063182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study.
Zehms CT; Whiddon DR; Miller MD; Quinby JS; Montgomery SL; Campbell RB; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):472-80. PubMed ID: 18375281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Achilles allograft using transfemoral double-bundle and tibial inlay technique].
Zhang L; Liu JS; Sun J; Li ZY; Ma J
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Dec; 21(12):890-3. PubMed ID: 19146153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a modified tibial-inlay double-bundle technique.
Lee SH; Jung YB; Lee HJ; Jung HJ; Kim SH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Mar; 94(6):516-22. PubMed ID: 22438000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Arthroscopic transtibial double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using calcaneal-tendon allograft].
Li J; Chen G; Tu CQ; Li Q
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 Sep; 36(5):730-3. PubMed ID: 16235551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.
Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.
Seon JK; Song EK
Arthroscopy; 2006 Jan; 22(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16399457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inlay technique with quadriceps tendon-bone autograft.
Chuang TY; Ho WP; Chen CH; Liao YS; Chen WJ
Arthroscopy; 2004 Apr; 20(4):e23-8. PubMed ID: 15067293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
