155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20844253)
1. Reducing the effects of background noise during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging of speech processing: qualitative and quantitative comparisons between two image acquisition schemes and noise cancellation.
Blackman GA; Hall DA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):693-704. PubMed ID: 20844253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of continuous sampling with active noise cancelation and sparse sampling for cortical and subcortical auditory functional MRI.
Dewey RS; Hall DA; Plack CJ; Francis ST
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Nov; 86(5):2577-2588. PubMed ID: 34196020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved Speech Hearing in Noise with Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation.
Patel P; Khalighinejad B; Herrero JL; Bickel S; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
J Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 42(17):3648-3658. PubMed ID: 35347046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisitions in tonal and speech perception tasks.
Zaehle T; Schmidt CF; Meyer M; Baumann S; Baltes C; Boesiger P; Jancke L
Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1195-204. PubMed ID: 17644001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory cortex encodes the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous sound.
Kilian-Hütten N; Valente G; Vroomen J; Formisano E
J Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 31(5):1715-20. PubMed ID: 21289180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.
Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):721-32. PubMed ID: 17089376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.
Vander Ghinst M; Bourguignon M; Op de Beeck M; Wens V; Marty B; Hassid S; Choufani G; Jousmäki V; Hari R; Van Bogaert P; Goldman S; De Tiège X
J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 26843641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Hall DA; Chambers J; Akeroyd MA; Foster JR; Coxon R; Palmer AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):347-59. PubMed ID: 19173422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.
Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):703-20. PubMed ID: 17080440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise.
Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory intensity processing: Effect of MRI background noise.
Angenstein N; Stadler J; Brechmann A
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():87-92. PubMed ID: 26778471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination.
Shah NJ; Jäncke L; Grosse-Ruyken ML; Müller-Gärtner HW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10030646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial dissociation of changes of level and signal-to-noise ratio in auditory cortex for tones in noise.
Ernst SM; Verhey JL; Uppenkamp S
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 18722535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.
Schmidt CF; Zaehle T; Meyer M; Geiser E; Boesiger P; Jancke L
Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Jan; 29(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17318832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Music listening engages specific cortical regions within the temporal lobes: differences between musicians and non-musicians.
Angulo-Perkins A; Aubé W; Peretz I; Barrios FA; Armony JL; Concha L
Cortex; 2014 Oct; 59():126-37. PubMed ID: 25173956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing centre in Heschl's gyrus.
Puschmann S; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B; Thiel CM
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1641-9. PubMed ID: 19782757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception.
Osnes B; Hugdahl K; Specht K
Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2437-45. PubMed ID: 20932914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
