These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20844857)
1. [What is new in breast imaging? From bench to bedside]. Helbich TH; Reiser M; Schlossbauer T; Imhof H Radiologe; 2010 Nov; 50(11):954. PubMed ID: 20844857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An imaging approach to high-risk screening for breast cancer. Jochelson MS; Morris EA Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21134530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast imaging flow models. Parikh JR J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 17411578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Issues in breast imaging. Cole CF Lippincotts Prim Care Pract; 1998; 2(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 9727110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital mammography. An alternative to current screening?]. Langer M MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Jul; 146(27-28):14. PubMed ID: 15526654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendations for the surveillance of young women at increased risk for breast cancer. Hadden WE Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17217483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast imaging. An update. Van Steen A JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):74-5. PubMed ID: 10859902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis. Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG; Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies. Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA; Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should women at high risk of breast cancer have screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Houssami N; Wilson R Breast; 2007 Feb; 16(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17189696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women. Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?]. Bick U Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast tomosynthesis. Buzek N Adv Nurse Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(10):25-6, 28. PubMed ID: 20000159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques. Weinstein S; Rosen M Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening with MRI--what are the data for patients at high risk? Liberman L N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 15282358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. Lee CH; Dershaw DD; Kopans D; Evans P; Monsees B; Monticciolo D; Brenner RJ; Bassett L; Berg W; Feig S; Hendrick E; Mendelson E; D'Orsi C; Sickles E; Burhenne LW J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 20129267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark. Bihrmann K; Jensen A; Olsen AH; Njor S; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 18416951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]