These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20846216)

  • 1. Evaluation of the retentive characteristics of semi-precision extracoronal attachments.
    Hedzelek W; Rzatowski S; Czarnecka B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 38(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 20846216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear behavior of precision attachments.
    Wichmann MG; Kuntze W
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 10709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of rigid and nonrigid extracoronal attachments on supporting tissues in extension base partial removable dental prostheses: a nonlinear finite element study.
    Wang HY; Zhang YM; Yao D; Chen JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 May; 105(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 21530760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro retention loss of attachment-retained removable partial denture.
    Can G; Özmumcu B; Altinci P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1049-53. PubMed ID: 24858749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro wear of different material combinations of intracoronal precision attachments.
    Holst S; Blatz MB; Eitner S; Wichmann M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):330-2. PubMed ID: 16900814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear of ball attachments after 1 to 8 years of clinical use: a qualitative analysis.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Nader SA; Feine J; de Albuquerque RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 21519577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of resistance form on attachment strength of resin-retained castings.
    Wilkes PW; Shillingburg HT; Johnson DL
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 2000; 90(3):16-20, 22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 11314309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Surface stress analysis of distal extension removable partial denture retained with two types of semi-precision attachments].
    Wang Y; Mi N; Qing F; Liu F; Chen J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 19(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 12539480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extracoronal resilient attachments in distal-extension removable partial dentures.
    Ku YC; Shen YF; Chan CP
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 11203941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading.
    Gamborena JI; Hazelton LR; NaBadalung D; Brudvik J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 9206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symposium on semiprecision attachments in removable partial dentures. Extracoronal attachments.
    Wolfe RE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Jan; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 3882471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.