These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20846216)

  • 21. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments.
    Fromentin O; Picard B; Tavernier B
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 11(3):391-7; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 10379298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink Locator attachments: an in vitro study.
    Nguyen CT; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20040032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Custom precision attachment housings for removable partial dentures.
    Goto Y; Brudvik JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 12239485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro evaluation of resin-retained extracoronal precision attachments.
    Doherty NM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2012672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trend of change in retentive force for bar attachments with different materials.
    Saito M; Kanazawa M; Takahashi H; Uo M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1545-52. PubMed ID: 25023010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism.
    Wiemeyer AS; Agar JR; Kazemi RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 11677540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Removable partial denture design with a splint bar and precision attachments.
    Givan DA; Kolodney H
    Compendium; 1993 May; 14(5):670, 672, 674-6; quiz 678. PubMed ID: 8358759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Force needed to separate acrylic resin from primed and unprimed frameworks of different designs.
    Lee G; Engelmeier RL; Gonzalez M; Powers JM; Perezous LF; O'Keefe KL
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19682221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of attachments for removable partial denture design: Part 2. Treatment planning and attachment selection.
    Burns DR; Ward JE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 2133384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of retention characteristics in prefabricated and custom-cast dental attachments.
    Fu CC; Hsu YT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 19432765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report.
    Waddell JN; Payne AG; Swain MV; Kieser JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20148915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [First clinical experiences with ceramic ball attachments for overdentures].
    Büttel AE; Schmidli F; Marinello CP; Lüthy H
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 18293602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro evaluation of the effect of thermal and mechanical fatigues on the bonding of an autopolymerizing soft denture liner to denture base materials using different primers.
    Minami H; Suzuki S; Minesaki Y; Kurashige H; Tanaka T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 18355165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of resin-bonded extracoronal attachments with removable partial denture: case report.
    Orsi IA; Bezzon OL; Marchi S; Fernandes FH
    Gerodontology; 2010 Dec; 27(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 19469879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.