These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20847579)

  • 1. Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy.
    Vermeire K; Punte AK; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 20847579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
    Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Reiss S; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 19052929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise.
    Franz BK; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    Am J Otol; 1987 Nov; 8(6):516-8. PubMed ID: 3434615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users.
    Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Au DK; Kals M; Zierhofer C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Sep; 130(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 20141488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.