These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20847756)

  • 21. Orthopaedic specialist registrar selection: the advantages of a candidate ranking procedure at interview.
    Savage PE; Hinves BL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Jul; 82(7 Suppl):222-6. PubMed ID: 11026845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of Asynchronous Video Interviews for Selecting Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
    Breitkopf DM; Green IC; Hopkins MR; Torbenson VE; Camp CL; Turner NS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134 Suppl 1():9S-15S. PubMed ID: 31568035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of Part I National Board scores in the selection of residents in ophthalmology and otolaryngology.
    McCollister RJ
    JAMA; 1988 Jan; 259(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 3336142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resident characteristics to evaluate during recruitment and interview: a Delphi study.
    Martin M; Salzberg L
    Educ Prim Care; 2017 Mar; 28(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 27966391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part II.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22208827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of a modified multiple mini-interview method to assess non-cognitive qualities during resident candidate interviews.
    Henneman A; Haines S
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 May; 12(5):585-589. PubMed ID: 32336457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of anesthesiology residents.
    Baker JD; Bailey MK; Brahen NH; Conroy JM; Dorman BH; Haynes GR
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 8431240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.
    Peskun C; Detsky A; Shandling M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17209893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlating factors to resident performance in an ophthalmology program.
    Catalano RA; Jenkins PL
    Ophthalmology; 1989 Apr; 96(4):552-4. PubMed ID: 2726188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Residency selection: should interviewers be given applicants' board scores?
    Smilen SW; Funai EF; Bianco AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):508-13. PubMed ID: 11228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The multiple mini-interview for emergency medicine resident selection.
    Hopson LR; Burkhardt JC; Stansfield RB; Vohra T; Turner-Lawrence D; Losman ED
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 24462031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process.
    Nallasamy S; Uhler T; Nallasamy N; Tapino PJ; Volpe NJ
    Ophthalmology; 2010 May; 117(5):1041-7. PubMed ID: 20110128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program.
    Thomas A; Young ME; Mazer BL; Lubarsky SE; Razack SI
    Occup Ther Health Care; 2015 Apr; 29(2):186-200. PubMed ID: 25821884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
    Collins M; Curtis A; Artis K; Staib L; Bokhari J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 21129688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interviewer perceptions during the implementation of the multiple mini-interview model at a school of pharmacy.
    Murphy JA; Pattin AJ; Sarver JG; Seegert ML; Mertz S; Blashford E
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 Jul; 12(7):864-871. PubMed ID: 32540049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.
    Holliday EB; Thomas CR; Kusano AS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 25936811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancing the residency interview process with the inclusion of standardised questions.
    Black C; Budner H; Motta AL
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):244-246. PubMed ID: 29127122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The residency interview is still paramount: results of a retrospective cohort study on concordance of dermatology residency applicant evaluators and influence of the applicant interview.
    Kamangar F; Davari P; Azari R; Fitzmaurice S; Li CS; Eisen DB; Fazel N
    Dermatol Online J; 2017 May; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 28537874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.