These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Experimental validation of LIFT for estimation of low-order modes in low-flux wavefront sensing. Plantet C; Meimon S; Conan JM; Fusco T Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(14):16337-52. PubMed ID: 23938486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting the comparison between the Shack-Hartmann and the pyramid wavefront sensors via the Fisher information matrix. Plantet C; Meimon S; Conan JM; Fusco T Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(22):28619-33. PubMed ID: 26561131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensing more modes with fewer sub-apertures: the LIFTed Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Meimon S; Fusco T; Michau V; Plantet C Opt Lett; 2014 May; 39(10):2835-7. PubMed ID: 24978215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of CMOS Pixel and Electronic Circuitry in the Performance of a Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Sensor. Abecassis ÚV; de Lima Monteiro DW; Salles LP; de Moraes Cruz CA; Agra Belmonte PN Sensors (Basel); 2018 Sep; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30274297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomographic wavefront error using multi-LGS constellation sensed with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors. Robert C; Conan JM; Gratadour D; Schreiber L; Fusco T J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A201-15. PubMed ID: 21045881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance comparison between Shack-Hartmann and astigmatic hybrid wavefront sensors. Barwick S Appl Opt; 2009 Dec; 48(36):6967-72. PubMed ID: 20029599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth-resolved wavefront aberrations using a coherence-gated Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Tuohy S; Podoleanu AG Opt Express; 2010 Feb; 18(4):3458-76. PubMed ID: 20389356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preprocessed cumulative reconstructor with domain decomposition: a fast wavefront reconstruction method for pyramid wavefront sensor. Shatokhina I; Obereder A; Rosensteiner M; Ramlau R Appl Opt; 2013 Apr; 52(12):2640-52. PubMed ID: 23669672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The placido wavefront sensor and preliminary measurement on a mechanical eye. Carvalho LA; Castro JC Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 16501413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simple characterisation of a deformable mirror inside a high numerical aperture microscope using phase diversity. Débarre D; Vieille T; Beaurepaire E J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 21801177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Error propagation: a comparison of Shack-Hartmann and curvature sensors. Kellerer AN; Kellerer AM J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 May; 28(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 21532691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wave-front sensing from subdivision of the focal plane with a lenslet array. Clare RM; Lane RG J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jan; 22(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 15669622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring the centroid gain of a Shack-Hartmann quad-cell wavefront sensor by using slope discrepancy. van Dam MA J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Aug; 22(8):1509-14. PubMed ID: 16134845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scintillation resistant wavefront sensing based on multi-aperture phase reconstruction technique. Aubailly M; Vorontsov MA J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Aug; 29(8):1707-16. PubMed ID: 23201888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interferometric Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor with an array of four-hole apertures. López D; Ríos S Appl Opt; 2010 Apr; 49(12):2334-8. PubMed ID: 20411013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes. Clare RM; Le Louarn M; Béchet C Appl Opt; 2011 Feb; 50(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 21283238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]