These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20848367)

  • 1. Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on oxygen cost and subjective preference rankings of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.
    Klodd E; Hansen A; Fatone S; Edwards M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 20848367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on gait of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.
    Klodd E; Hansen A; Fatone S; Edwards M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(9):899-910. PubMed ID: 21174254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study.
    McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation.
    Darter BJ; Wilken JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23525888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing.
    Raschke SU; Orendurff MS; Mattie JL; Kenyon DE; Jones OY; Moe D; Winder L; Wong AS; Moreno-Hernández A; Highsmith MJ; J Sanderson D; Kobayashi T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25480541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
    Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users.
    Hansen AH; Meier MR; Sessoms PH; Childress DS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 17162519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
    Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet.
    Gailey RS; Gaunaurd I; Agrawal V; Finnieston A; O'Toole C; Tolchin R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):597-612. PubMed ID: 22773262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
    De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Otto Bock solid ankle cushion heel foot with wooden keel to the low-cost CR-Equipements
    Lacraz A; Armand S; Turcot K; Carmona G; Stern R; Borens O; Assal M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):258-265. PubMed ID: 27881551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
    Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait.
    Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Finnieston A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Oct; 37(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 23364890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
    Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical and dynamic characterization of prosthetic feet for high activity users during weighted and unweighted walking.
    Koehler-McNicholas SR; Nickel EA; Barrons K; Blaharski KE; Dellamano CA; Ray SF; Schnall BL; Hendershot BD; Hansen AH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202884. PubMed ID: 30208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of prosthetic ankle units on roll-over shape characteristics during walking in persons with bilateral transtibial amputations.
    Gard SA; Su PF; Lipschutz RD; Hansen AH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(9):1037-48. PubMed ID: 22234709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a flexible pylon system on functional mobility of transtibial amputees. A prospective randomized study.
    Lass R; Kickinger W; Guglia P; Kubista B; Kastner J; Windhager R; Holzer G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Dec; 49(6):837-47. PubMed ID: 23860421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor.
    Postema K; Hermens HJ; de Vries J; Koopman HF; Eisma WH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 9141123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Gait Variable Change over Time as Transtibial Amputees Adapt to a New Prosthesis Foot.
    Zhang X; Fiedler G; Liu Z
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9252368. PubMed ID: 31236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.