These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20849832)
41. English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events. Kersten AW; Meissner CA; Lechuga J; Schwartz BL; Albrechtsen JS; Iglesias A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):638-53. PubMed ID: 20853990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Perception of American-English Vowels by Early and Late Spanish-English Bilinguals. Baigorri M; Campanelli L; Levy ES Lang Speech; 2019 Dec; 62(4):681-700. PubMed ID: 30354920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Posterior N1 asymmetry to English and Welsh words in Early and Late English-Welsh bilinguals. Grossi G; Savill N; Thomas E; Thierry G Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 20542079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. Alho K; Winkler I; Escera C; Huotilainen M; Virtanen J; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Ilmoniemi RJ Psychophysiology; 1998 Mar; 35(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 9529947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study. Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Auditory perception and attention as reflected by the brain event-related potentials in children with Asperger syndrome. Lepistö T; Silokallio S; Nieminen-von Wendt T; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2161-71. PubMed ID: 16890012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electrophysiological correlates of speech perception mechanisms and individual differences in second language attainment. Jakoby H; Goldstein A; Faust M Psychophysiology; 2011 Nov; 48(11):1517-1531. PubMed ID: 21762446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Temporal integration of deviant sound in automatic detection reflected by mismatch negativity. Shiga T; Yabe H; Yu L; Nozaki M; Itagaki S; Lan TH; Niwa S Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):337-41. PubMed ID: 21502927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Costa A; Santesteban M; Ivanova I J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1057-74. PubMed ID: 16938046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Lengeris A; Hazan V J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluation of multi-attribute auditory discrimination in dyslexia with the mismatch negativity. Kujala T; Lovio R; Lepistö T; Laasonen M; Näätänen R Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 16497552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessing the double phonemic representation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English: an electrophysiological study. García-Sierra A; Ramírez-Esparza N; Silva-Pereyra J; Siard J; Champlin CA Brain Lang; 2012 Jun; 121(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 22534571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Discrimination of foreign language speech contrasts by English monolinguals and French/English bilinguals. McKelvie-Sebileau P; Davis C J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3025-35. PubMed ID: 24815282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features. Hölig C; Berti S Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study. Pekkonen E; Rinne T; Reinikainen K; Kujala T; Alho K; Näätänen R Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 8735151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Auditory cortical change detection in adults with Asperger syndrome. Lepistö T; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R; Kujala T Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 414(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 17197079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Language switching mechanisms in simultaneous interpreters: an ERP study. Proverbio AM; Leoni G; Zani A Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1636-56. PubMed ID: 15327931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds. Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Early exposure to non-native language alters pre-attentive vowel discrimination. Peltola MS; Kuntola M; Tamminen H; Hämäläinen H; Aaltonen O Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 16039056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]