BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20849925)

  • 1. Localizing sensory and cognitive systems for pre-attentive visual deviance detection: an sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al. (2009).
    Kimura M; Ohira H; Schröger E
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 20849925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
    Justen C; Herbert C
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
    Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Ohira H; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 19207207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence.
    Doeller CF; Opitz B; Mecklinger A; Krick C; Reith W; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):1270-82. PubMed ID: 14568496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations.
    Winkler I; Horváth J; Weisz J; Trejo LJ
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 19733617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired MMN/P3a complex in first-episode psychosis: cognitive and psychosocial associations.
    Hermens DF; Ward PB; Hodge MA; Kaur M; Naismith SL; Hickie IB
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2010 Aug; 34(6):822-9. PubMed ID: 20302901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of lower- vs. upper-hemifield presentation on automatic colour-deviance detection: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Müller D; Roeber U; Winkler I; Trujillo-Barreto N; Czigler I; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 1472():89-98. PubMed ID: 22820304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual mismatch negativity and unintentional temporal-context-based prediction in vision.
    Kimura M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 22137965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.
    Li X; Lu Y; Sun G; Gao L; Zhao L
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():7. PubMed ID: 22300600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance.
    Schwartze M; Rothermich K; Schmidt-Kassow M; Kotz SA
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 21382437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic auditory change detection in humans is influenced by visual-auditory associative learning.
    Laine M; Kwon MS; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1697-701. PubMed ID: 17921871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory.
    Tiitinen H; May P; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6501):90-2. PubMed ID: 7969425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedforward and recurrent processing in scene segmentation: electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Scholte HS; Jolij J; Fahrenfort JJ; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2097-109. PubMed ID: 18416684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moderate alcohol disrupts a mechanism for detection of rare events in human visual cortex.
    Kenemans JL; Hebly W; van den Heuvel EH; Grent-'T-Jong T
    J Psychopharmacol; 2010 Jun; 24(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 19028837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERPs and deviance detection: visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli.
    Czigler I; Weisz J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jun; 401(1-2):178-82. PubMed ID: 16600495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.