BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20850061)

  • 1. Food-related Stroop interference in obese and normal-weight individuals: behavioral and electrophysiological indices.
    Nijs IM; Franken IH; Muris P
    Eat Behav; 2010 Dec; 11(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 20850061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety.
    Nijs IM; Muris P; Euser AS; Franken IH
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 19922752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of food-related stimuli on visual spatial attention in fasting and nonfasting normal subjects: Behavior and electrophysiology.
    Leland DS; Pineda JA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 16337433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological indices of visual food cue-reactivity. Differences in obese, overweight and normal weight women.
    Hume DJ; Howells FM; Rauch HG; Kroff J; Lambert EV
    Appetite; 2015 Feb; 85():126-37. PubMed ID: 25464021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Food cue-elicited brain potentials in obese and healthy-weight individuals.
    Nijs IM; Franken IH; Muris P
    Eat Behav; 2008 Dec; 9(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 18928910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal attentional responses to food size are abnormal in obese subjects: an electroencephalographic study.
    Babiloni C; Del Percio C; Valenzano A; Marzano N; De Rosas M; Petito A; Bellomo A; Rossi G; Lecce B; Mundi C; Lizio R; Eusebi F; Cibelli G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1441-8. PubMed ID: 19616997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety.
    Eldar S; Yankelevitch R; Lamy D; Bar-Haim Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 20655976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional cortical responses to enlarged faces are related to body fat in normal weight subjects: an electroencephalographic study.
    Babiloni C; Del Percio C; De Rosas M; Valenzano A; Vecchio F; Marzano N; Rendina C; Di Santo C; Ciociola L; Lecce B; Mundi C; Eusebi F; Cibelli G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):922-31. PubMed ID: 19380251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impairment of inhibitory control in response to food-associated cues and attentional bias of obese participants and normal-weight controls.
    Loeber S; Grosshans M; Korucuoglu O; Vollmert C; Vollstädt-Klein S; Schneider S; Wiers RW; Mann K; Kiefer F
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2012 Oct; 36(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 21986703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function.
    Castellanos EH; Charboneau E; Dietrich MS; Park S; Bradley BP; Mogg K; Cowan RL
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2009 Sep; 33(9):1063-73. PubMed ID: 19621020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced processing of food-related pictures in female external eaters.
    Nijs IM; Franken IH; Muris P
    Appetite; 2009 Dec; 53(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 19647769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task.
    Thomas SJ; Johnstone SJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Mar; 63(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17123655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of sensitivity to external food cues in attentional allocation to food words on dot probe and Stroop tasks.
    Johansson L; Ghaderi A; Andersson G
    Eat Behav; 2004 Jul; 5(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 15135338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two successive phases in the threat-related attentional response of anxious subjects: neural correlates.
    Mercado F; Carretié L; Hinojosa JA; Peñacoba C
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(12):1141-50. PubMed ID: 19798751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information processing of food cues in overweight and normal weight adolescents.
    Soetens B; Braet C
    Br J Health Psychol; 2007 May; 12(Pt 2):285-304. PubMed ID: 17456287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit and explicit selective attention to smoking cues in smokers indexed by brain potentials.
    Littel M; Franken IH
    J Psychopharmacol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):503-13. PubMed ID: 20716580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The processing bias for threatening cues revealed by event-related potential and event-related oscillation analyses.
    Sun J; Sun B; Wang B; Gong H
    Neuroscience; 2012 Feb; 203():91-8. PubMed ID: 22233779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-course of attentional bias for pain-related cues in chronic daily headache sufferers.
    Liossi C; Schoth DE; Bradley BP; Mogg K
    Eur J Pain; 2009 Oct; 13(9):963-9. PubMed ID: 19071045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.