These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20850513)

  • 1. Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.
    Srinivasan AG; Landsberger DM; Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 20850513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
    Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.
    Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():98-107. PubMed ID: 26778546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
    Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.
    Landsberger D; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1559-66. PubMed ID: 21895094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.
    Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3190. PubMed ID: 28682084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation.
    Zhu Z; Tang Q; Zeng FG; Guan T; Ye D
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):45-58. PubMed ID: 22138630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.
    Nelson DA; Kreft HA; Anderson ES; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3916-33. PubMed ID: 21682414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitch ranking with different virtual channel configurations in electrical hearing.
    Padilla M; Stupak N; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():54-62. PubMed ID: 28216122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Erenberg SR; Taylor J; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3406-17. PubMed ID: 23145621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.
    Saoji AA; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Litvak LM
    Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():109-16. PubMed ID: 23299125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.
    Landsberger DM; Srinivasan AG
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 19383534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Jones GL; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23297914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding pitch contours using current steering.
    Luo X; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Srinivasan AG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1215-23. PubMed ID: 20815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Lin P; Lu T; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):962-9. PubMed ID: 23363113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Garrett C
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.