These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20850698)
1. Current status of cytology laboratories in anatomic pathology departments. Buesa RJ Ann Diagn Pathol; 2010 Oct; 14(5):347-54. PubMed ID: 20850698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An update survey of academic radiologists' clinical productivity. Lu Y; Zhao S; Chu PW; Arenson RL J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jul; 5(7):817-26. PubMed ID: 18585659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A spreadsheet program measuring laboratory productivity in several ways: an application of College of American Pathology scores and other data to assess the overall economics of clinical laboratories. Daniel A Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 10171497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing cytotechnologist workload above 100 slides per day using the ThinPrep imaging system leads to significant reductions in screening accuracy. Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Cooper MK; Johnson ML; Hawkins AP; Renshaw AA Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 20151428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LMIP (Laboratory Management Index Program): the next generation in productivity measurement. Reilly B MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Dec; 25(12):42-9. PubMed ID: 10130883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathology laboratories productivity evaluation in Turkey. Yörükoğlu K; Uner S; Harorlu F; Usubütün A Turk Patoloji Derg; 2011; 27(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 21935874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual estimated sensitivity and workload for manual screening of SurePath gynecologic cytology. Ellis K; Renshaw AA; Dudding N Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 22246923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring the academic radiologist's clinical productivity: survey results for subspecialty sections. Arenson RL; Lu Y; Elliott SC; Jovais C; Avrin DE Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):524-32. PubMed ID: 11394548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens. Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society of Cytopathology workload recommendations for automated Pap test screening: developed by the productivity and quality assurance in the era of automated screening task force. Elsheikh TM; Austin RM; Chhieng DF; Miller FS; Moriarty AT; Renshaw AA; Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Feb; 41(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22351120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and workload for manual and automated gynecologic screening: best current estimates. Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Sep; 39(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 20945459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The academic radiologist's clinical productivity: an update. Lu Y; Arenson RL Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1211-23. PubMed ID: 16112517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time study of clinical and nonclinical workload in pathology and laboratory medicine. Trotter MJ; Larsen ET; Tait N; Wright JR Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 131(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 19461078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current malaria situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Bismil'din FB; Shapieva ZhZh; Anpilova EN Med Parazitol (Mosk); 2001; (1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11548308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1. Clary KM; Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Austin RM; Thomas N; Chmara BA; Sugrue C; Tworek J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controls in quality assessment in gynecologic cytology: A rational approach to workload limits for the ThinPrep imaging system. Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Oct; 38(10):772-5. PubMed ID: 20091901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]