398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20850745)
1. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography.
Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.
Hamed HO; Shahin AY; Elsamman AM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated three-dimensional coded contrast imaging hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: feasibility in office tubal patency testing.
Exacoustos C; Di Giovanni A; Szabolcs B; Romeo V; Romanini ME; Luciano D; Zupi E; Arduini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 22648792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency.
Exacoustos C; Zupi E; Carusotti C; Lanzi G; Marconi D; Arduini D
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Aug; 10(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 14567814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution.
Boudghène FP; Bazot M; Robert Y; Perrot N; Rocourt N; Antoine JM; Morris H; Leroy JL; Uzan S; Bigot JM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of patient tolerance of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with Echovist-200 and X-ray hysterosalpingography for outpatient investigation of infertile women.
Ayida G; Kennedy S; Barlow D; Chamberlain P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 8705414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility?
Dijkman AB; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Hogerzeil HV
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sonographic evaluation of tubal patency with stimulated acoustic emission imaging.
Prefumo F; Serafini G; Martinoli C; Gandolfo N; Gandolfo NG; Derchi LE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 20(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 12383323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.
Robertshaw IM; Sroga JM; Batcheller AE; Martinez AM; Winter TC; Sinning K; Maxwell R; Lindheim SR
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27126400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency.
Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Luciano AA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 24910933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With Four-Dimensional Technique for Screening Fallopian Tubal Patency: Let's Make an Exploration.
Chen F; Quan J; Huang P; You X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 28034794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiologic versus ultrasound fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast-ultrasonography with echovist 200].
Korell M; Seehaus D; Strowitzki T; Hepp H
Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9173524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Real-Time Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography with B Mode Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in the Evaluation of Fallopian Tube Patency in Patients Undergoing Infertility Investigations.
Chen S; Du X; Chen Q; Chen S
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9408141. PubMed ID: 31275995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (3D-HyCoSy) as an outpatient procedure to assess infertile women: a pilot study.
Kiyokawa K; Masuda H; Fuyuki T; Koseki M; Uchida N; Fukuda T; Amemiya K; Shouka K; Suzuki K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 16(7):648-54. PubMed ID: 11169373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients.
Moro F; Tropea A; Selvaggi L; Scarinci E; Lanzone A; Apa R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():22-5. PubMed ID: 25597884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Could antispasmodic drug reduce pain during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) in infertile patients? A randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Moro F; Selvaggi L; Sagnella F; Morciano A; Martinez D; Gangale MF; Ciardulli A; Palla C; Uras ML; De Feo E; Boccia S; Tropea A; Lanzone A; Apa R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 22223598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
