These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20852077)

  • 1. Citizen complaints and environmental regulation of Michigan livestock operations.
    Hadrich JC; Wolf CA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):277-86. PubMed ID: 20852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness of nitrate leaching mitigation measures for grassland livestock systems at locations in England and Wales.
    Cardenas LM; Cuttle SP; Crabtree B; Hopkins A; Shepherd A; Scholefield D; del Prado A
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Feb; 409(6):1104-15. PubMed ID: 21211821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement and impact of agricultural odors from a large scale swine production farm.
    Warner PO; Sidhu KS; Chadzynski L
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1990 Aug; 32(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 2389544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The concentration of swine production. Effects on swine health, productivity, human health, and the environment.
    Donham KJ
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2000 Nov; 16(3):559-97. PubMed ID: 11084993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Awareness and pro-active adoption of surface water BMPs.
    Hadrich JC; Van Winkle A
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():221-7. PubMed ID: 23764472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the environmental performance of English arable and livestock holdings using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN).
    Westbury DB; Park JR; Mauchline AL; Crane RT; Mortimer SR
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 21075506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of livestock farming activity on the quality of surface water.
    Cesoniene L; Dapkiene M; Sileikiene D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):32678-32686. PubMed ID: 30467746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agricultural odours: 25 years of reducing complaints about barns and manure storages using the minimum distance separation formulae.
    Fraser HW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):211-7. PubMed ID: 11762464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Odor measurements for manure spreading using a subsurface deposition applicator.
    Lau A; Bittman S; Lemus G
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2003 Mar; 38(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 12617560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of odor complaints at a large composite reservoir in a highly urbanized area: A machine learning approach.
    Mulrow J; Kshetry N; Brose DA; Kumar K; Jain D; Shah M; Kunetz TE; Varshney LR
    Water Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 92(3):418-429. PubMed ID: 31386777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental assessment of livestock farms in the context of BAT system introduction in Russia.
    Briukhanov A; Vasilev E; Kozlova N; Shalavina E; Subbotin I; Lukin S
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():283-288. PubMed ID: 31181477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Characteristics of nitrogen cycling in farm systems in a small watershed of Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China].
    Lin S; Feng ML; Hu RG; Liu RY; Wei MY; Jiang C
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 31(3):632-8. PubMed ID: 20358819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure-complaint relationships of various environmental odor sources in Styria, Austria.
    Weitensfelder L; Moshammer H; Öttl D; Payer I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):9806-9815. PubMed ID: 30734914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of agricultural practices and river catchment characteristics on river and bathing water quality.
    Aitken MN
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(10):217-24. PubMed ID: 15137173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Waste management systems of dairy cattle farms in Japan.
    Shima E; Svoboda IF; Tsutsumi S; Ohkubo H
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):63-9. PubMed ID: 12201128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs of emission-reducing manure application.
    Huijsmans J; Verwijs B; Rodhe L; Smith K
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 May; 93(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 14987715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing phosphorus runoff from dairy farms.
    Bosch DJ; Wolfe ML; Knowlton KF
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(3):918-27. PubMed ID: 16641330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-farm phosphorus balance on western dairy farms.
    Spears RA; Young AJ; Kohn RA
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Feb; 86(2):688-95. PubMed ID: 12647976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dairy farm impacts of fencing riparian land: pasture production and farm productivity.
    Aarons SR; Melland AR; Dorling L
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():255-66. PubMed ID: 24095788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.