153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20852212)
1. Reply to: Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Boman J; Nylander E
Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Jul; 21(7):530. PubMed ID: 20852212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. RE: Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Falk L; Fredlund H
Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Dec; 21(12):847. PubMed ID: 21297101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium; is first void urine or genital swab best?
Hartgill U; Kalidindi K; Molin SB; Kaste SR
Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Mar; 91(2):141. PubMed ID: 25253762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of one-sample testing of self-obtained vaginal swabs and first catch urine samples separately and in combination for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by two amplified DNA assays in women visiting a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
van Dommelen L; Dukers-Muijrers N; van Tiel FH; Brouwers EE; Hoebe CJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):533-5. PubMed ID: 21217415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pooling of clinical specimens prior to testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR is accurate and cost saving.
Currie MJ; McNiven M; Yee T; Schiemer U; Bowden FJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4866-7. PubMed ID: 15472365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High analytical sensitivity and low rates of inhibition may contribute to detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in significantly more women by the APTIMA Combo 2 assay.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Luinstra K; Chong S; Smieja M; Cai W; Hayhoe B; Portillo E; Macritchie C; Main C; Ewert R
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 44(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 16455891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of vaginal introital sampling as an alternative approach for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
Domeika M; Bassiri M; Butrimiene I; Venalis A; Ranceva J; Vasjanova V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Feb; 78(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 10023876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of penile skin swab with intra-urethral swab and first void urine for polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in male patients.
Pittaras TE; Papaparaskevas J; Houhoula DP; Legakis NJ; Frangouli E; Katsambas A; Tsakris A; Papadogeorgakis H
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Dec; 35(12):999-1001. PubMed ID: 18665017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among young people. The effect of home-sampling and mailing the samples].
Ostergaard LJ; Andersen BS; Olesen F; Møller JK
Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Aug; 161(32):4514-8. PubMed ID: 10477967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vaginal microbicides can interfere with nucleic acid amplification tests used for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.
Crucitti T; Jespers V; Van Damme L; Van Dyck E; Buvé A
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Jan; 57(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 16860515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of temperature, medium, and storage duration on Chlamydia trachomatis DNA detection by PCR.
van Dommelen L; Wolffs PF; van Tiel FH; Dukers N; Herngreen SB; Bruggeman CA; Hoebe CJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 51(3):990-2. PubMed ID: 23254134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay to ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Copes D; Patel J; Petrich A; Biers K; Sproston A; Kapala J
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2306-7. PubMed ID: 11376077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of PCR for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection on self-obtained mailed vaginal samples.
Domeika M; Drulyte O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 10929957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young women in Northern Sardinia.
Zanetti S; Usai D; Molicotti P; Deriu A; Sechi LA
New Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 30(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 17319603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and vaginal swabs and urine specimens from women undergoing termination of pregnancy.
Renton A; Thomas BM; Gill S; Lowndes C; Taylor-Robinson D; Patterson K
Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Jul; 17(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 16820072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Which test is best to diagnose genital chlamydia infection?].
Moi H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Jul; 131(13-14):1279. PubMed ID: 21725382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-obtained vaginal swabs for PCR chlamydia testing: a practical alternative.
Rose SB; Lawton BA; Bromhead C; Macdonald EJ; Lund KA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 17877602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification and evaluation of a combination of chlamydial antigens to support the diagnosis of severe and invasive Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Forsbach-Birk V; Simnacher U; Pfrepper KI; Soutschek E; Kiselev AO; Lampe MF; Meyer T; Straube E; Essig A
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Aug; 16(8):1237-44. PubMed ID: 19723133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal method of collection of first-void urine for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men.
Wisniewski CA; White JA; Michel CE; Mahilum-Tapay L; Magbanua JP; Nadala EC; Barber PJ; Goh BT; Lee HH
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):1466-9. PubMed ID: 18234860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
