These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study. Boyd EA; Bero LA JAMA; 2000 Nov; 284(17):2209-14. PubMed ID: 11056592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Financial conflicts of interest and the NIH. Steinbrook R N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 14736923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Role of PhD Faculty in Advancing Research in Departments of Surgery. Bell TM; Valsangkar N; Joshi M; Mayo J; Blanton C; Zimmers TA; Torbeck L; Koniaris LG Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):111-115. PubMed ID: 28009734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Coauthor Country Affiliations in International Collaborative Research Funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017. Grubbs JC; Glass RI; Kilmarx PH JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915989. PubMed ID: 31755947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. NIH needs to raise oversight of conflicts of interest among researchers, report says. Tanne JH BMJ; 2008 Feb; 336(7638):235. PubMed ID: 18244975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Conflicts of interest in government-funded studies. Pickar JH Climacteric; 2015 Jun; 18(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 25690623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. NIH will restrict outside income: tighter rules address concerns about conflicts of interest. Weiss R Washington Post; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 15700372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The NIH ethics crackdown: a message to the research community. Flynn G Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 16395777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients. Dove A Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Innovation incentives or corrupt conflicts of interest? Moving beyond Jekyll and Hyde in regulating biomedical academic-industry relationships. Taylor PL Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2013; 13(1):135-97. PubMed ID: 23815042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Research accountability and financial conflicts of interest in industry-sponsored clinical research: a review. Tereskerz PM Account Res; 2003; 10(3):137-58. PubMed ID: 14979317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. New ethical requirements at the NIH: implications for CIHR and Canada. Bernstein A CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 16103503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Ethics. Senate inquiry on research conflicts shifts to grantees. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5884):1708. PubMed ID: 18583586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Lawmakers examine the possibility of favoritism in a $40-million NIH contract with Harvard. Brainard J Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(13):A19. PubMed ID: 15287136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform. Maatz CT High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]