These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2085269)

  • 1. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography during excretory urography: our experience.
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2085269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience].
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 2377752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Excretory urography using computed radiography.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Hunter TB; Claypool HR; Westerman BR; Mockbee B
    Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 3797646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of flat-panel radiography and computed radiography in urography].
    Zähringer M; Kamm KF; Krug B; Braun W; Coburger S; Winnekendonk G; Krüger K; Haupt G; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2002 May; 174(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 11997864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
    Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital radiography in urography].
    Salvini E; Abbona M; Barigozzi P; Favini G; Pedroli G; Crespi A; Pastori R; Cerutti R; Stacul F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 77(1-2):44-50. PubMed ID: 2928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The diagnostic value of digital and conventional imaging in intravenous urography].
    Hundt C; Kohz P; Leinsinger G; Fink U; Schätzl M
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography in excretory urography.
    Uchida K; Nakamura K; Watanabe H; Egashira K; Ishino Y; Murakami M; Nakata H
    J Digit Imaging; 1996 Aug; 9(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 8854265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT urography.
    Kawashima A; Vrtiska TJ; LeRoy AJ; Hartman RP; McCollough CH; King BF
    Radiographics; 2004 Oct; 24 Suppl 1():S35-54; discussion S55-8. PubMed ID: 15486248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current Techniques and Clinical Applications of Computed Tomography Urography.
    Krishnan V; Chawla A; Sharbidre KG; Peh WCG
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(4):245-256. PubMed ID: 28774661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed radiography excretory urography: can the system sensitivity value be used as an image quality indicator?
    Andoh K; Odagiri K; Matsumoto T; Yamashita K; Ogino I; Otsuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 9268909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomography urography with 16-channel multidetector computed tomography: a pictorial review.
    Kawamoto S; Horton KM; Fishman EK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 15480029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital nephropyelography following intravenous renal digital subtraction angiography.
    Hillman BJ; Seeley GW; Roehrig H; Tracey P; Raynaud AC
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 6353479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K
    Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.
    Körner M; Weber CH; Wirth S; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser MF; Treitl M
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 17495286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.