231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20852963)
1. Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ([¹H]MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in identifying prostate cancer foci in patients with negative biopsy and high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA).
Panebianco V; Sciarra A; Ciccariello M; Lisi D; Bernardo S; Cattarino S; Gentile V; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2010 Dec; 115(8):1314-29. PubMed ID: 20852963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI/MRSI for patients with persistently high PSA levels and negative TRUS-guided biopsy results.
Bhatia C; Phongkitkarun S; Booranapitaksonti D; Kochakarn W; Chaleumsanyakorn P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jul; 90(7):1391-9. PubMed ID: 17710982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PCA3 urinary test versus 1H-MRSI and DCEMR in the detection of prostate cancer foci in patients with biochemical alterations.
Panebianco V; Sciarra A; De Berardinis E; Busetto GM; Lisi D; Buonocore V; Gentile V; Di Silverio F; Passariello R
Anticancer Res; 2011 Apr; 31(4):1399-405. PubMed ID: 21508392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for prostate cancer detection.
Perdonà S; Di Lorenzo G; Autorino R; Buonerba C; De Sio M; Setola SV; Fusco R; Ronza FM; Caraglia M; Ferro M; Petrillo A
Urol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(6):761-5. PubMed ID: 21906966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Ciccariello M; Salciccia S; Cattarino S; Lisi D; Gentilucci A; Alfarone A; Bernardo S; Passariello R; Gentile V
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Mar; 16(6):1875-83. PubMed ID: 20197480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with spectroscopic imaging using a surface coil. Initial clinical experience.
Manenti G; Squillaci E; Carlani M; Mancino S; Di Roma M; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 16623302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy.
Yuen JS; Thng CH; Tan PH; Khin LW; Phee SJ; Xiao D; Lau WK; Ng WS; Cheng CW
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1482-6. PubMed ID: 15017203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study.
Amsellem-Ouazana D; Younes P; Conquy S; Peyromaure M; Flam T; Debré B; Zerbib M
Eur Urol; 2005 May; 47(5):582-6. PubMed ID: 15826747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: Preliminary results on quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and spectroscopy imaging.
Fusco R; Sansone M; Petrillo M; Setola SV; Granata V; Botti G; Perdonà S; Borzillo V; Muto P; Petrillo A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 27071309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate with three functional techniques in patients with PSA elevation before initial TRUS-guided biopsy.
Hauth E; Hohmuth H; Cozub-Poetica C; Bernand S; Beer M; Jaeger H
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150422. PubMed ID: 26268144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer.
Lattouf JB; Grubb RL; Lee SJ; Bjurlin MA; Albert P; Singh AK; Ocak I; Choyke P; Coleman JA
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1041-6. PubMed ID: 17437438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner.
Singh AK; Krieger A; Lattouf JB; Guion P; Grubb RL; Albert PS; Metzger G; Ullman K; Smith S; Fichtinger G; Ocak I; Choyke P; Ménard C; Coleman J
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 17922874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer.
Vilanova JC; Barceló-Vidal C; Comet J; Boada M; Barceló J; Ferrer J; Albanell J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W715-22. PubMed ID: 21606259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; Della Monica P; Gallo T; Tartaglia V; Vestita E; Ferrando U; Regge D
Clin Radiol; 2008 Aug; 63(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18625351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after cryosurgery: evaluation by transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Parivar F; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Nelson SJ; Carroll PR
Urology; 1996 Oct; 48(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 8886066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Pinker K; Bogner W; Baltzer P; Gruber S; Bickel H; Brueck B; Trattnig S; Weber M; Dubsky P; Bago-Horvath Z; Bartsch R; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 24566292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
