These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20853257)
1. Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study. Scuderi GL; Cascone NC; Regine F; Perdicchi A; Cerulli A; Recupero SM Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 20853257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects. Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure. Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer. Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Salim S; Du H; Wan J J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma. Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Munkwitz S; Elkarmouty A; Hoffmann EM; Pfeiffer N; Thieme H Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 246(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 18196259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes. Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness. Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by iCare tonometers and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Sachdeva R; Iordanous Y; Lin T Can J Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 58(5):426-432. PubMed ID: 35809628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometer. Moreno-Montañés J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Sabater AL; Morales-Fernandez L; Sáenz C; Garcia-Feijoo J J Glaucoma; 2015 Sep; 24(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24844537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer. Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes. Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]