272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20853671)
1. Study of the correlation between microfauna and the macrostructure of activated sludge and the efficiency of biological wastewater treatment plants.
Signorile G; Molinari A; Lugoli F; Sciancalepore L; Montemurro P; De Donno A
J Prev Med Hyg; 2010 Mar; 51(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 20853671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative studies of the kinetics of hygienically relevant microorganisms in activated sludge].
Schomburg I; Müller HE
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1987 Jun; 184(3-4):183-94. PubMed ID: 3116782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial population dynamics at effluent treatment plants.
Moharikar A; Purohit HJ; Kumar R
J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 15931414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bacteriophages--potential for application in wastewater treatment processes.
Withey S; Cartmell E; Avery LM; Stephenson T
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 339(1-3):1-18. PubMed ID: 15740754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-filamentous sludge bulking caused by a deficiency of nitrogen in industrial wastewater treatment.
Peng Y; Gao C; Wang S; Ozaki M; Takigawa A
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):289-95. PubMed ID: 12906302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of copper in the protistan community of activated sludge.
Nicolau A; Martins MJ; Mota M; Lima N
Chemosphere; 2005 Feb; 58(5):605-14. PubMed ID: 15620754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fate of pathogenic microorganisms and indicators in secondary activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
Wen Q; Tutuka C; Keegan A; Jin B
J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1442-7. PubMed ID: 18977580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of cadmium on the performance of an activated SBR sludge treatment.
Santos A; Alonso E; Riesco P
Environ Technol; 2005 Feb; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 15791793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry.
Foladori P; Bruni L; Tamburini S; Ziglio G
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3807-18. PubMed ID: 20537673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a static magnetic field on formaldehyde biodegradation in wastewater by activated sludge.
Łebkowska M; Rutkowska-Narożniak A; Pajor E; Pochanke Z
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Oct; 102(19):8777-82. PubMed ID: 21824771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of DNA-based microbial community composition and substrate utilisation patterns of activated sludge microorganisms from wastewater treatment plants operated under different conditions.
Matsuda M; Inoue D; Anami Y; Tsutsui H; Sei K; Soda S; Ike M
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(11):2843-51. PubMed ID: 20489257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge during the simulation of wastewater treatment plants using a risk assessment model.
Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Gernaey KV; Rosen C
Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4527-38. PubMed ID: 19695661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design procedure for carbon removal in contact stabilization activated sludge process.
Sarioğlu M; Orhon D; Görgün E; Artan N
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):285-92. PubMed ID: 14753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological treatment of synthetic wastewater containing 2,4 dichlorophenol (DCP) in an activated sludge unit.
Kargi F; Eker S; Uygur A
J Environ Manage; 2005 Aug; 76(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 15922505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure of microbial communities in activated sludge: potential implications for assessing the biodegradability of chemicals.
Forney LJ; Liu WT; Guckert JB; Kumagai Y; Namkung E; Nishihara T; Larson RJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2001 May; 49(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 11386714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process.
Fuchs W; Resch C; Kernstock M; Mayer M; Schoeberl P; Braun R
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 15743625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SBBGR technology for minimising excess sludge production in biological processes.
Di Iaconi C; De Sanctis M; Rossetti S; Ramadori R
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1825-32. PubMed ID: 20137803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coliforms removal in full-scale activated sludge plants in India.
Kazmi AA; Tyagi VK; Trivedi RC; Kumar A
J Environ Manage; 2008 May; 87(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 17408847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
