These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20853824)

  • 1. Use of barcoded pyrosequencing and shared OTUs to determine sources of fecal bacteria in watersheds.
    Unno T; Jang J; Han D; Kim JH; Sadowsky MJ; Kim OS; Chun J; Hur HG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(20):7777-82. PubMed ID: 20853824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated online system for a pyrosequencing-based microbial source tracking method that targets Bacteroidetes 16S rDNA.
    Unno T; Di DY; Jang J; Suh YS; Sadowsky MJ; Hur HG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21780740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples.
    Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; McGee CD
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
    Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
    Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a quantitative H2S MPN test for fecal microbes analysis of water using biochemical and molecular identification.
    McMahan L; Grunden AM; Devine AA; Sobsey MD
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1693-704. PubMed ID: 22244995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Next-generation sequencing reveals fecal contamination and potentially pathogenic bacteria in a major inflow river of Taihu Lake.
    Vadde KK; Feng Q; Wang J; McCarthy AJ; Sekar R
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Nov; 254(Pt B):113108. PubMed ID: 31491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.
    Parajuli PB; Mankin KR; Barnes PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(2):953-63. PubMed ID: 18703332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of Enterococcus spp. from human and animal feces using 16S rRNA sequences, the esp gene, and PFGE for microbial source tracking in Korea.
    Kim SY; Lee JE; Lee S; Lee HT; Hur HG; Ko G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3423-8. PubMed ID: 20356091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of phylogenetic microarray analysis to discriminate sources of fecal pollution.
    Dubinsky EA; Esmaili L; Hulls JR; Cao Y; Griffith JF; Andersen GL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(8):4340-7. PubMed ID: 22360280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
    Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human-specific fecal bacteria in wastewater treatment plant effluents.
    Wéry N; Monteil C; Pourcher AM; Godon JJ
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1873-83. PubMed ID: 19945729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of equine fecal contamination: the search for alternative bacterial source-tracking targets.
    Simpson JM; Santo Domingo JW; Reasoner DJ
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Jan; 47(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 19712347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing hog lagoon waste contamination in the Cape Fear Watershed using Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing.
    Arfken AM; Song B; Mallin MA
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 99(17):7283-93. PubMed ID: 26189016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene.
    Lamendella R; Domingo JW; Oerther DB; Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 59(3):651-60. PubMed ID: 17069624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
    Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminant analysis of fecal bacterial species composition for use as a phenotypic microbial source tracking method.
    Evenson CJ; Strevett KA
    Res Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 157(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 16725314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
    Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.