These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20854000)

  • 21. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony.
    Vroomen J; Keetels M; de Gelder B; Bertelson P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15561498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 22022895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sounds change four-dot masking.
    Vroomen J; Keetels M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19012870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Facilitating and inhibiting effects of the orientation of attention using peripheral cues].
    Riggio L; Chieffi S; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1992 Feb; 68(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 1510834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sounds can affect visual perception mediated primarily by the parvocellular pathway.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Vis Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 26(5-6):477-86. PubMed ID: 20137106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Slagter HA; Cipriani G
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17553604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sound-aided recovery from and persistence against visual filling-in.
    Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1907-17. PubMed ID: 15145684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus.
    Treccani B; Umiltà C; Tagliabue M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):268-86. PubMed ID: 16634670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multisensory integration affects visuo-spatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1099-109. PubMed ID: 21553989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.