These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20854009)

  • 1. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?
    Koen JD; Aly M; Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1726-41. PubMed ID: 23834057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial temporal lobe function and recognition memory: a novel approach to separating the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Song Z; Jeneson A; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):16026-32. PubMed ID: 22049444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of frontal lobe lesions on the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory.
    MacPherson SE; Bozzali M; Cipolotti L; Dolan RJ; Rees JH; Shallice T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3124-32. PubMed ID: 18675284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double dissociation of selective recollection and familiarity impairments following two different surgical treatments for temporal-lobe epilepsy.
    Bowles B; Crupi C; Pigott S; Parrent A; Wiebe S; Janzen L; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2640-7. PubMed ID: 20466009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manipulating the depth of processing reveals the relevance of second eye fixations for recollection but not familiarity.
    Schwedes C; Scherer D; Wentura D
    Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 31236764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
    Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.
    Mickes L; Johnson EM; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):843-63. PubMed ID: 20565205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive aging: a common decline of episodic recollection and spatial memory in rats.
    Robitsek RJ; Fortin NJ; Koh MT; Gallagher M; Eichenbaum H
    J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(36):8945-54. PubMed ID: 18768688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance: Behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Liu Z; Wu J; Wang Y; Guo C
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Jan; 167():107130. PubMed ID: 31786310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.
    Juola JF; Caballero-Sanz A; Muñoz-García AR; Botella J; Suero M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):855-876. PubMed ID: 30949925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval.
    Cohn M; Moscovitch M; Lahat A; McAndrews MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(52):22451-5. PubMed ID: 20007783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
    Smith CN; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15693-702. PubMed ID: 22049412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex impairs familiarity but not recollection.
    Aly M; Yonelinas AP; Kishiyama MM; Knight RT
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 225(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21827792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.
    Gottlieb LJ; Rugg MD
    Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 18(9):565-73. PubMed ID: 21852431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiarity and recollection processes in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia and their unaffected parents.
    Lefèbvre AA; Cellard C; Tremblay S; Achim A; Rouleau N; Maziade M; Roy MA
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jan; 175(1-2):15-21. PubMed ID: 19945175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.