229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20855111)
1. A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
Krishnan JA; Schatz M; Apter AJ
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 127(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20855111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can CER be an effective tool for change in the development and assessment of new drugs and technologies?
Brixner DI; Watkins JB
J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 Jun; 18(5 Supp A):S06-11. PubMed ID: 22663293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.
Ramos KJ; Somayaji R; Nichols DP; Goss CH
Paediatr Drugs; 2018 Feb; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28776129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
Carson SS; Goss CH; Patel SR; Anzueto A; Au DH; Elborn S; Gerald JK; Gerald LB; Kahn JM; Malhotra A; Mularski RA; Riekert KA; Rubenfeld GD; Weaver TE; Krishnan JA;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24160906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Building the evidence base for decision making in cancer genomic medicine using comparative effectiveness research.
Goddard KA; Knaus WA; Whitlock E; Lyman GH; Feigelson HS; Schully SD; Ramsey S; Tunis S; Freedman AN; Khoury MJ; Veenstra DL
Genet Med; 2012 Jul; 14(7):633-42. PubMed ID: 22516979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The landscape of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology.
DeWitt EM; Brunner HI
Nat Rev Rheumatol; 2014 Jan; 10(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 24061502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Brouwers MC; Thabane L; Moher D; Straus SE
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4202-7. PubMed ID: 23071227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative effectiveness research in practice and policy for radiation oncology.
Lawrence WF
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24314343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.
Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E23-54. PubMed ID: 20119474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Lam KC; Bacon CEW; Sauers EL; Bay RC
J Athl Train; 2020 Mar; 55(3):217-228. PubMed ID: 31618071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of comparative effectiveness research: a practical tool.
Schaumberg DA; McDonald L; Shah S; Stokes M; Nordstrom BL; Ramagopalan SV
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 May; 7(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 29463115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Armstrong K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
