These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2085557)

  • 1. Some methodological questions concerning receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis as a method for assessing image quality in radiology.
    Harrington MB
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 Nov; 3(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 2085557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 17178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance.
    Monnier-Cholley L; Carrat F; Cholley BP; Tubiana JM; Arrivé L
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 15486213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
    Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points.
    Halpern EJ; Albert M; Krieger AM; Metz CE; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Mar; 3(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 8796672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Search and nonsearch protocols for radiographic consultation.
    Swensson RG; Theodore GH
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 2244000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    Centor RM; Schwartz JS
    Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3841685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.
    Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH
    Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of observer performance studies in dose optimization: a focus on free-response receiver operating characteristic methods.
    Thompson JD; Manning DJ; Hogg P
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Jun; 41(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 23625536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
    Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
    Chakraborty DP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology.
    Berbaum KS; Franken EA; Dorfman DD; Rooholamini SA; Kathol MH; Barloon TJ; Behlke FM; Sato Y; Lu CH; el-Khoury GY
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 2312249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gains in accuracy from replicated readings of diagnostic images: prediction and assessment in terms of ROC analysis.
    Metz CE; Shen JH
    Med Decis Making; 1992; 12(1):60-75. PubMed ID: 1538634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
    Youmans DC; Don S; Hildebolt C; Shackelford GD; Luker GD; McAlister WH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 9798889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
    Chakraborty DP
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Carter JV; Pan J; Rai SN; Galandiuk S
    Surgery; 2016 Jun; 159(6):1638-1645. PubMed ID: 26962006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.