BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20856048)

  • 1. Intracranial fixation pin migration: a complication of external Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in Apert syndrome.
    Cai M; Shen G; Wang X; Fang B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1557-9. PubMed ID: 20856048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Le Fort III rigid external distraction complicated by intracranial movement of halo fixation pins.
    Breugem CC; Bush K; Fitzpatrick DF
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 18452360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal carotid dissection after Le Fort III distraction in Apert syndrome: a case report.
    Nout E; Mathijssen IM; van der Meulen JJ; van Veelen ML; Koning AH; Lequin MH; Wolvius EB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):529-33. PubMed ID: 20303281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midfacial distraction without osteotomy using a transfacial pin and external devices.
    Coeugniet E; Dhellemmes P; Vinchon M; Wolber A; Pellerin P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 22337404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alar Pinning in Rigid External Distraction for Midfacial Hypoplasia.
    Yu JL; Woo AS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 79(3):275-279. PubMed ID: 28570459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
    Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of early rigid fixation and removal of rigid external distraction system after distraction osteogenesis of the midface.
    Yun IS; Park BY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):576-80. PubMed ID: 21403555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
    Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype.
    Paliga JT; Goldstein JA; Storm PB; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1380-2. PubMed ID: 24015416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Surgical correction of craniofacial dysostosis with midface distraction osteogenesis].
    Mu XZ; Yu ZY; Wei M; Xu HS; Chai G; Cao DJ; Zhang RH; Feng SZ; Zhang DS
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(15):1055-7. PubMed ID: 18005589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.
    Meling TR; Høgevold HE; Due-Tønnessen BJ; Skjelbred P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21109402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device.
    Klammert U; Böhm H; Schweitzer T; Würzler K; Gbureck U; Reuther J; Kübler A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 19157890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature.
    Nout E; Cesteleyn LL; van der Wal KG; van Adrichem LN; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 37(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 18486452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multivectorial, external halo-assisted midface distraction in patients with severe hypoplasia.
    Malagon HH; Romo GW; Quintero Mosqueda FR; Magaña FG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1663-9. PubMed ID: 19098577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications in maxillary distraction using the RED II device: a retrospective analysis of 21 patients.
    Nout E; Wolvius EB; van Adrichem LN; Ongkosuwito EM; van der Wal KG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(10):897-902. PubMed ID: 17008053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype.
    Paliga JT; Goldstein JA; Storm PB; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):596-8. PubMed ID: 23524752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of distraction osteogenesis in severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft palate].
    Fan H; Wang X; Lin Y; Zhou Y; Yi B; Li Z
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 May; 82(10):699-702. PubMed ID: 12133471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.