These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2085624)

  • 1. Using group testing to estimate a proportion, and to test the binomial model.
    Chen CL; Swallow WH
    Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):1035-46. PubMed ID: 2085624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor unit number estimation--a Bayesian approach.
    Ridall PG; Pettitt AN; Henderson RD; McCombe PA
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1235-50. PubMed ID: 17156299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design.
    Barlow WE
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 7786988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
    Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Step-up multiple testing of parameters with unequally correlated estimates.
    Dunnett CW; Tamhane AC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 7766777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data.
    Robinson MD; Smyth GK
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 17728317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an antimicrobial resistance monitoring program for Campylobacter in poultry by simulation.
    Regula G; Lo Fo Wong DM; Ledergerber U; Stephan R; Danuser J; Bissig-Choisat B; Stärk KD
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Aug; 70(1-2):29-43. PubMed ID: 15967240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and analysis of group sequential logrank tests in maximum duration versus information trials.
    Kim K; Boucher H; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 7548714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness of group testing in the estimation of proportions.
    Hung M; Swallow WH
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 11318160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cluster-adjusted sample size algorithm for proportions was developed using a beta-binomial model.
    Fosgate GT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17292018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A gamma model for extra-binomial variation in dilution assays.
    O'Neill TJ; O'Neill HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):237-42. PubMed ID: 8513105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomization model methods for evaluating treatment efficacy in multicenter clinical trials.
    Davis CS; Chung Y
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1163-74. PubMed ID: 7548700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The problem of multiple testing and solutions for genome-wide studies].
    Gyorffy B; Gyorffy A; Tulassay Z
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Mar; 146(12):559-63. PubMed ID: 15853065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hypothesis testing for proportions with overdispersion.
    Pack SE
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):967-72. PubMed ID: 3814737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling--how big a sample?
    Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 10432610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficiency of the multiple trial randomized response technique.
    Liu PT; Chow LP
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):607-18. PubMed ID: 963174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for a treatment effect in the presence of nonresponders.
    Boos DD; Brownie C
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):191-7. PubMed ID: 3719056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.