These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2085634)

  • 1. A simple EM algorithm for capture-recapture data with categorical covariates.
    Baker SG
    Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):1193-7, Discussion 1198-200. PubMed ID: 2085634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A semiparametric method for estimating population size for capture-recapture experiments with random covariates in continuous time.
    Yip PS; Lin HZ; Xi L
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1085-92. PubMed ID: 16401282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating equations with incomplete categorical covariates in the Cox model.
    Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1002-13. PubMed ID: 9750248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A class of latent Markov models for capture-recapture data allowing for time, heterogeneity, and behavior effects.
    Bartolucci F; Pennoni F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):568-78. PubMed ID: 17688509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capture-recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity.
    Thandrayen J; Wang Y
    Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 20669247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer and cost-effectiveness of thermal diagnostic techniques.
    Berger GS; Keith LG
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 107():839-49. PubMed ID: 6820147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
    Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating lead time and sensitivity in a screening program without estimating the incidence in the screened group.
    Straatman H; Peer PG; Verbeek AL
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):217-29. PubMed ID: 9147591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
    Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple binary indicators of latent classes.
    Larsen K
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 15032777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Markov chain Monte Carlo EM algorithm for analyzing interval-censored data under the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Goggins WB; Finkelstein DM; Schoenfeld DA; Zaslavsky AM
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1498-507. PubMed ID: 9883548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families.
    Grabrick DM; Anderson VE; King RA; Kushi LH; Sellers TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(2):150-64. PubMed ID: 10030398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors in mass screening for breast cancer, multivariate analysis of data from the Cuban diagnosis pilot study.
    Fernández L; Buch ML; Molina A; Carabelloso M; Gausioso R; Lage A
    Neoplasma; 1986; 33(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 3762813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computing an NPMLE for a mixing distribution in two closed heterogeneous population size models.
    Mao CX
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):983-92. PubMed ID: 18821726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The University of Rochester model of breast cancer detection and survival.
    Hanin LG; Miller A; Zorin AV; Yakovlev AY
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):66-78. PubMed ID: 17032896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regression analysis of interval-censored survival data with covariates using log-linear models.
    Kim DK
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1274-83. PubMed ID: 9423249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive test in a repeated screening program.
    Xu JL; Fagerstrom RM; Prorok PC; Kramer BS
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):651-60. PubMed ID: 15339287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood methods for incomplete longitudinal binary responses with incomplete categorical covariates.
    Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 11318157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of age-specific sensitivity and sojourn time in breast cancer screening studies.
    Cong XJ; Shen Y; Miller AB
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3123-38. PubMed ID: 15977269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.