62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20857283)
1. Robust classification of low-grade cervical cytology following analysis with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and subsequent application of self-learning classifier eClass.
Kelly JG; Angelov PP; Trevisan J; Vlachopoulou A; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Nov; 398(5):2191-201. PubMed ID: 20857283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biospectroscopy insights into the multi-stage process of cervical cancer development: probing for spectral biomarkers in cytology to distinguish grades.
Purandare NC; Patel II; Trevisan J; Bolger N; Kelehan R; von Bünau G; Martin-Hirsch PL; Prendiville WJ; Martin FL
Analyst; 2013 Jul; 138(14):3909-16. PubMed ID: 23338619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with a classification machine for the analysis of blood plasma or serum: a novel diagnostic approach for ovarian cancer.
Gajjar K; Trevisan J; Owens G; Keating PJ; Wood NJ; Stringfellow HF; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Analyst; 2013 Jul; 138(14):3917-26. PubMed ID: 23325355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ATR microspectroscopy with multivariate analysis segregates grades of exfoliative cervical cytology.
Walsh MJ; Singh MN; Pollock HM; Cooper LJ; German MJ; Stringfellow HF; Fullwood NJ; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2007 Jan; 352(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 17141660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic cervical cell segmentation and classification in Pap smears.
Chankong T; Theera-Umpon N; Auephanwiriyakul S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 24433758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy classification in survival prediction.
Jiménez F; Sánchez G; Juárez JM
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Mar; 60(3):197-219. PubMed ID: 24525210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A spectral phenotype of oncogenic human papillomavirus-infected exfoliative cervical cytology distinguishes women based on age.
Kelly JG; Cheung KT; Martin C; O'Leary JJ; Prendiville W; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Aug; 411(15-16):1027-33. PubMed ID: 20359472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics: An interesting tool to discriminate and characterize counterfeit medicines.
Custers D; Cauwenbergh T; Bothy JL; Courselle P; De Beer JO; Apers S; Deconinck E
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2015 Aug; 112():181-9. PubMed ID: 25476739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid-based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high-grade dyskaryosis?
Blanks RG; Kelly RS
Cytopathology; 2010 Dec; 21(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 20955376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid diagnosis of cervical cancer based on serum FTIR spectroscopy and support vector machines.
Xue Y; Zheng X; Wu G; Wang J
Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 38(1):276. PubMed ID: 38001244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory performance measures: evidence against low-risk women explaining low detection rates of high-grade abnormalities.
Mitchell HS
Cytopathology; 2005 Apr; 16(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 15787649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor margin identification and prediction of the primary tumor from brain metastases using FTIR imaging and support vector machines.
Bergner N; Romeike BF; Reichart R; Kalff R; Krafft C; Popp J
Analyst; 2013 Jul; 138(14):3983-90. PubMed ID: 23563220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach.
Yang J; Singh H; Hines EL; Schlaghecken F; Iliescu DD; Leeson MS; Stocks NG
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jun; 55(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22503644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust support vector machine-trained fuzzy system.
Forghani Y; Yazdi HS
Neural Netw; 2014 Feb; 50():154-65. PubMed ID: 24316676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staging of cervical cancer with soft computing.
Mitra P; Mitra S; Pal SK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jul; 47(7):934-40. PubMed ID: 10916265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The nearest subclass classifier: a compromise between the nearest mean and nearest neighbor classifier.
Veenman CJ; Reinders MJ
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1417-29. PubMed ID: 16173185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
