These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20857284)

  • 41. Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin-Labeling, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and DSC Perfusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Prospective Study.
    Nguyen TB; Zakhari N; Velasco Sandoval S; Guarnizo-Capera A; Alexios Gulak M; Woulfe J; Jansen G; Thornhill R; Majtenyi N; Cron GO
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):134-142. PubMed ID: 36702501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improving the Grading Accuracy of Astrocytic Neoplasms Noninvasively by Combining Timing Information with Cerebral Blood Flow: A Multi-TI Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Study.
    Yang S; Zhao B; Wang G; Xiang J; Xu S; Liu Y; Zhao P; Pfeuffer J; Qian T
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2209-2216. PubMed ID: 27561831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers.
    Awasthi R; Rathore RK; Soni P; Sahoo P; Awasthi A; Husain N; Behari S; Singh RK; Pandey CM; Gupta RK
    Neuroradiology; 2012 Mar; 54(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 21541688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors.
    Arisawa A; Watanabe Y; Tanaka H; Takahashi H; Matsuo C; Fujiwara T; Fujiwara M; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Jun; 60(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 29705876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preoperative Grading of Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI: Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Analysis of Intra-tumoural and Peri-tumoural Tissue.
    Soliman RK; Gamal SA; Essa AA; Othman MH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 167():86-92. PubMed ID: 29471287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Application of histogram analysis for the evaluation of vascular permeability in glioma by the K2 parameter obtained with the dynamic susceptibility contrast method: Comparisons with Ktrans obtained with the dynamic contrast enhance method and cerebral blood volume.
    Taoka T; Kawai H; Nakane T; Hori S; Ochi T; Miyasaka T; Sakamoto M; Kichikawa K; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 27109485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging.
    Park MJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Ryu CW; Park SM; Kim SY
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 30(7):1402-8. PubMed ID: 19369602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Diagnostic Value of Combining Permeability with T1 Perfusion Parameters in Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Glioma Grading].
    Sun SJ; Qian HF; Li FQ; Li ZY; Wu X
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Dec; 37(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 26725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of BOLD cerebrovascular reactivity mapping and DSC MR perfusion imaging for prediction of neurovascular uncoupling potential in brain tumors.
    Pillai JJ; Zacà D
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 11(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 22376130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perfusion MRI grading diffuse gliomas: Impact of permeability parameters on molecular biomarkers and survival.
    Hilario A; Hernandez-Lain A; Sepulveda JM; Lagares A; Perez-Nuñez A; Ramos A
    Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed); 2019; 30(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30143443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
    Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison between CT and MR in perfusion imaging assessment of high-grade gliomas.
    De Simone M; Muccio CF; Pagnotta SM; Esposito G; Cianfoni A
    Radiol Med; 2013 Feb; 118(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 22430675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin Labeling in Comparison With Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion for Brain Tumor Surveillance at 3T MRI.
    Lavrova A; Teunissen WHT; Warnert EAH; van den Bent M; Smits M
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():849657. PubMed ID: 35669426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Paradoxical perfusion metrics of high-grade gliomas with an oligodendroglioma component: quantitative analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
    Sunwoo L; Choi SH; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Won JK; Park SH; Kim IH
    Neuroradiology; 2015 Nov; 57(11):1111-20. PubMed ID: 26232204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining "T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging" and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging.
    Saini J; Gupta PK; Sahoo P; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Beniwal M; Thennarasu K; Santosh V; Gupta RK
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Jan; 60(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 29090331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging.
    Law M; Cha S; Knopp EA; Johnson G; Arnett J; Litt AW
    Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 11867790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].
    Lev MH; Ozsunar Y; Henson JW; Rasheed AA; Barest GD; Harsh GR; Fitzek MM; Chiocca EA; Rabinov JD; Csavoy AN; Rosen BR; Hochberg FH; Schaefer PW; Gonzalez RG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Feb; 25(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 14970020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
    Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experimenting with ASL-based arterialized cerebral blood volume as a novel imaging biomarker in grading glial neoplasms.
    Senger KPS; Kesavadas C; Thomas B; Singh A; Multani GS; An D; Label M; Suchandrima B; Shin D
    Neuroradiol J; 2023 Dec; 36(6):728-735. PubMed ID: 37548164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.