152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20857309)
1. Accuracy of templates for navigated implantation made by rapid prototyping with DICOM datasets of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).
Weitz J; Deppe H; Stopp S; Lueth T; Mueller S; Hohlweg-Majert B
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):1001-6. PubMed ID: 20857309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S
Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
Peck JN; Conte GJ
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cerec meets Galileos--integrated implantology for completely virtual implant planning.
Reiz SD; Neugebauer J; Karapetian VE; Ritter L
Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 25098162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A single appointment protocol to create a partially edentulous CAD/CAM guided surgical template: a clinical report.
Marchack CB; Charles A; Pettersson A
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 22133389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of chairside-milled CAD/CAM drill guides for dental implants.
Ritter L; Palmer J; Bindl A; Irsen S; Cizek J; Karapetian VE; Zöller JE
Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 25098159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach.
Komiyama A; Pettersson A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20868453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
van der Zel JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Options in virtual 3D, optical-impression-based planning of dental implants.
Reich S; Kern T; Ritter L
Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 25098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.
Wismeijer D; Joda T; Flügge T; Fokas G; Tahmaseb A; Bechelli D; Bohner L; Bornstein M; Burgoyne A; Caram S; Carmichael R; Chen CY; Coucke W; Derksen W; Donos N; El Kholy K; Evans C; Fehmer V; Fickl S; Fragola G; Gimenez Gonzales B; Gholami H; Hashim D; Hui Y; Kökat A; Vazouras K; Kühl S; Lanis A; Leesungbok R; van der Meer J; Liu Z; Sato T; De Souza A; Scarfe WC; Tosta M; van Zyl P; Vach K; Vaughn V; Vucetic M; Wang P; Wen B; Wu V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():436-442. PubMed ID: 30328201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Working with DICOM craniofacial images.
Grauer D; Cevidanes LS; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):460-70. PubMed ID: 19732681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
