These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20859098)

  • 1. Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.
    Hart S; Bergquist S; Gajewski B; Dunton N
    J Nurs Adm; 2010 Oct; 40(10 Suppl):S16-25. PubMed ID: 20859098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.
    Hart S; Bergquist S; Gajewski B; Dunton N
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2006; 21(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 16816607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach.
    Bergquist-Beringer S; Gajewski B; Dunton N; Klaus S
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 21407089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.
    Tannen A; Dietz E; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 19239586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of pressure ulcer staging: ordinal probit Bayesian hierarchical model that allows for uncertain rater response.
    Gajewski BJ; Hart S; Bergquist-Beringer S; Dunton N
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4602-18. PubMed ID: 17393413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Nov; 13(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 15533101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrater reliability using Modified Norton Scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form-Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice.
    Bååth C; Hall-Lord ML; Idvall E; Wiberg-Hedman K; Wilde Larsson B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 18279294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical care nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention, staging and description.
    Pieper B; Mattern JC
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Mar; 43(2):22-6, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 9136995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the efficacy of a pressure ulcer prevention program by collecting prevalence and incidence data: a unit-based effort.
    Robinson C; Gloekner M; Bush S; Copas J; Kearns C; Kipp K; Labath B; Lonadier R; Lopez M; Nelson L; Newton S; Wentz D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 May; 49(5):44-6, 48-51. PubMed ID: 12732757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of photographs for the identification of pressure ulcers in elderly hospitalized patients: validity and reliability.
    Russell Localio A; Margolis DJ; Kagan SH; Lowe RA; Kinosian B; Abbuhl S; Kavesh W; Holmes JH; Ruffin A; Baumgarten M
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 16939581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
    Maklebust J; Sieggreen MY; Sidor D; Gerlach MA; Bauer C; Anderson C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Apr; 51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 16089059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics.
    Lahmann NA; Halfens RJ; Dassen T
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):20-33. PubMed ID: 16464992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy implications of using reverse staging to monitor pressure ulcer status.
    Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 9362575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical quality indicators of venous leg ulcers: development, feasibility, and reliability.
    Kjaer ML; Mainz J; Soernsen LT; Karlsmark T; Gottrup F
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 May; 51(5):64-6, 68-72, 74. PubMed ID: 16014986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure ulcers among nursing home residents: United States, 2004.
    Park-Lee E; Caffrey C
    NCHS Data Brief; 2009 Feb; (14):1-8. PubMed ID: 19389326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Pressure ulcer prevalence in German nursing homes and hospitals: what role does the National Nursing Expert Standard Prevention of Pressure Ulcer play?].
    Wilborn D; Halfens R; Dassen T; Tannen A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2010 Apr; 72(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 19551618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: views and beliefs of enrolled nurses and other health care workers.
    Buss IC; Halfens RJ; Abu-Saad HH; Kok G
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Sep; 13(6):668-76. PubMed ID: 15317506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.
    Beeckman D; Schoonhoven L; Fletcher J; Furtado K; Gunningberg L; Heyman H; Lindholm C; Paquay L; Verdú J; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(6):682-91. PubMed ID: 18039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.