176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20860065)
1. An algorithm for the design of group sequential triangular tests for single-arm clinical trials with a binary endpoint.
McWilliams TP
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2794-801. PubMed ID: 20860065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a mis-specification of the response rate under standard treatment in sequential clinical trials.
Sébille V; Bellissant E
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 19(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 16176336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four sequential methods allowing for early stopping of comparative clinical trials.
Sebille V; Bellissant E
Clin Sci (Lond); 2000 May; 98(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 10781388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group-sequential trials.
Glimm E; Maurer W; Bretz F
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 19827011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal continuous sequential boundaries for monitoring toxicity in clinical trials: a restricted search algorithm.
Goldman AI; Hannan PJ
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1575-89. PubMed ID: 11391689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiplicity and flexibility in clinical trials.
Brannath W; Koenig F; Bauer P
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 17674349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
Rudser KD; Emerson SS
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data-driven analysis strategies for proportion studies in adaptive group sequential test designs.
Wassmer G
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 14584710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
Morgan CC
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal two-stage designs allowing flexibility in number of subjects for phase II clinical trials.
Masaki N; Koyama T; Yoshimura I; Hamada C
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):721-31. PubMed ID: 20183436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential boundaries approach in clinical trials with unequal allocation ratios.
Jafari P; Ayatollahi SM; Behboodian J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 16412232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robustness of an odds-ratio test in a stratified group sequential trial with a binary outcome measure.
Srivastava DK; Rai SN; Pan J
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):351-64. PubMed ID: 17623341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction of group sequential designs in clinical trials on the basis of detectable treatment differences.
Schäfer H; Müller HH
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1413-24. PubMed ID: 15116350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
