129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20860066)
1. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2838-56. PubMed ID: 20860066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
Chen X; Wei L
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.
Kenward MG; Roger JH
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):983-97. PubMed ID: 9333350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size calculations for population pharmacodynamic experiments involving repeated dichotomous observations.
Ogungbenro K; Aarons L
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1212-27. PubMed ID: 18991118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selecting the best unbalanced repeated measures model.
Vallejo G; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE; Tuero-Herrero E
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 21287107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
Gosho M; Maruo K
Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of internal pilots with the univariate approach to repeated measures.
Coffey CS; Muller KE
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2469-85. PubMed ID: 12872303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.
Jung SH; Ahn CW
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the effects of interventions using longitudinal data with samples subject to selection.
Lin HM; Hughes MD
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):924-36. PubMed ID: 9290223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
Abad AA; Litière S; Molenberghs G
Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 20407039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exact statistical inference for group sequential trials.
Lin DY; Wei LJ; DeMets DL
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1399-408. PubMed ID: 1786325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed models for data from thorough QT studies: part 1. assessment of marginal QT prolongation.
Schall R; Ring A
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 21574242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size calculations with multiplicity adjustment for longitudinal clinical trials with missing data.
Lu K
Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 22162151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample sizes required to detect two-way and three-way interactions involving slope differences in mixed-effects linear models.
Heo M; Leon AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 20496206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
Correa JA; Bellavance F
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.
Pan W; Wall MM
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
